 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
This is my own translation of the French Wikipedia article. Goustien ( talk) 06:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk) 19:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Berber flag → Amazigh Flag – All occurences of "Berber" to mean "Amazigh" should be replaced by the latter because the former is considered a derogatory term by most Amazigh people. In fact, Amazigh people never make use of the term "Berber" in any context whatsoever, always using "Amazigh" instead. 105.153.193.15 ( talk) 18:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment If this concern about the term "Berber" is valid, it needs to be discussed at a much higher level than in the context of a single article about the flag. I think Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers would be the right place to raise this (and, right off the bat, you'd have to take issue with the name of that WikiProject). Largoplazo ( talk) 19:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think that this is a good choice. WikiProject Berbers is an inactive wikiProject and over 90% of its members are inactive (exept user:soupforone and user:Jroo222 and me ). So I think that We have to discuss this thing here. -- Aṭlas ( talk) 21:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Well, that project may be inactive, but that doesn't mean a single article on the flag is a useful place to hold a discussion that has an impact throughout the entirety of Berber-related articles. I oppose a move of this article that doesn't reflect a consensus regarding the use of the term "Berber" in general. Largoplazo ( talk) 22:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- I also oppose. This page should be kept as it is.-- Aṭlas ( talk) 22:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose, Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. if the majority of sources refer to this as 'Berber' then Berber is what we should use, per WP:COMMONNAME. Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose per above. ONR (talk) 02:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- oppose, per above this page should be kept as it is. Aṭlas ( talk) 20:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Berbers which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 15:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
This is my own translation of the French Wikipedia article. Goustien ( talk) 06:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( non-admin closure) — Andy W. ( talk) 19:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Berber flag → Amazigh Flag – All occurences of "Berber" to mean "Amazigh" should be replaced by the latter because the former is considered a derogatory term by most Amazigh people. In fact, Amazigh people never make use of the term "Berber" in any context whatsoever, always using "Amazigh" instead. 105.153.193.15 ( talk) 18:11, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment If this concern about the term "Berber" is valid, it needs to be discussed at a much higher level than in the context of a single article about the flag. I think Wikipedia:WikiProject Berbers would be the right place to raise this (and, right off the bat, you'd have to take issue with the name of that WikiProject). Largoplazo ( talk) 19:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think that this is a good choice. WikiProject Berbers is an inactive wikiProject and over 90% of its members are inactive (exept user:soupforone and user:Jroo222 and me ). So I think that We have to discuss this thing here. -- Aṭlas ( talk) 21:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Well, that project may be inactive, but that doesn't mean a single article on the flag is a useful place to hold a discussion that has an impact throughout the entirety of Berber-related articles. I oppose a move of this article that doesn't reflect a consensus regarding the use of the term "Berber" in general. Largoplazo ( talk) 22:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- I also oppose. This page should be kept as it is.-- Aṭlas ( talk) 22:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose, Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. if the majority of sources refer to this as 'Berber' then Berber is what we should use, per WP:COMMONNAME. Insert CleverPhrase Here 02:08, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- Strong oppose per above. ONR (talk) 02:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
- oppose, per above this page should be kept as it is. Aṭlas ( talk) 20:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Berbers which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 15:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)