A fact from Benjamin William Page appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 September 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Unclear sentence: "His family were on close terms with that of another Ipswich local, Rear-Admiral
Sir Edward Hughes, especially so his father, Reverend R. Leman, and his uncle, Reverend J. Leman." Comment: It's not clear from the sentence whether Rev. Leman is the father of Page or Hughes. If Leman is Page's father, why are their last names different? Is Page a step-son?
@
Djmaschek: Thanks for the review. Per the sources referenced in "Early life" and "Family", which are the only ones I've been able to locate that discuss his family in any detail: Page's father was the Rev. R. Leman and his uncle the Rev. J. Leman. His brother was named Samuel Page. He had nephews named Robert Leman Page, Samuel Flood Page, and Luke Flood Page, and nieces named Charlotte Page, Elizabeth Page, and Sophia Page. I think this demonstrates that the Leman and Page families were one and the same or at least connected through multiple marriages, however as of right now I have found no source that definitively says what the connection was. Putting his information into Ancestry actually provides a different set of parents but I've absolutely no sources to back that up. I'm going to keep looking in the hope that there will be something clearer out there!
Pickersgill-Cunliffe (
talk)
17:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Some people in these English families took the mother's name. That might occur if he inherited from his mother's family (see
Barnard Foord Bowes, Early career, paragraph 1). I asked the question because, if I was puzzled about this, other readers will probably be puzzled also.
Djmaschek (
talk)
18:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Djmaschek: Currently no idea who the mother was, unfortunately! Interestingly one thing I have come across in my search so far is a request for help from a historian in the 1800s who was also struggling to find members of Page's family! Will continue looking and hope to clarify as much as possible shortly (update: found a better source that provided details of parents - seems the other source I was using confused some different generations of his maternal family).
Pickersgill-Cunliffe (
talk)
18:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article is new enough and long enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. The image is fine. A QPQ has been completed. However, I don't see the hook in the article. I see "In May 1803 he was sent in the frigate, with secret orders announcing the start of the Napoleonic Wars, to the East Indies where his patron the now Vice-Admiral Rainier was still commander-in-chief." and "The war being very new, Page was able to use his awareness to his advantage". It seems likely to be the case, but that would be synthesis.
SL93 (
talk)
09:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Fair. Would changing the wording help? I agree on the synthesis point. An alternative:
It's unclear what war Sadras, Providien, Negapatam, and Trincomalee were part of - recommend making this clearer Done
" Page was appointed next to the frigate HMS Astraea on 19 October 1796 as her second lieutenant, serving on the Jamaica Station" - Do you mean 1786? Done - woops!
"He left Inflexible in February 1802 and went on half pay" - Is it known why? Semi-retirement, illness, excess of commanders over ships? Done - I can't categorically say why, but the timing coincides almost perfectly with the start of the
Peace of Amiens which saw government immediately start decommissioning ships to cut costs. I've added that he went on half pay as the Peace started but can't in good faith say any more.
Is De Haasje the same ship as the Batavian brig that became
HMS Phosphorus (1804)? If so, would a piped link be appropriate? Also, Page's
report in the London Gazette about the encounter with Haasje states that the ship's dispatches were thrown overboard. Marshall and O'Byrne both support the British knowing the dispatches though. Is there anything in other sources that would clarify this inconsistency with his Gazette report? Done - The ships are one and the same, thanks for bringing that to my attention, I'm amazed I wasn't already aware of it! The dispatches are a conundrum. It's possible that Page looked to hide the fact the dispatches had been taken intact, because the Gazette was an easily accessible publication by ally and enemy alike. Of course this is just conjecture, I've changed the text to focus more on the arrival of the ship itself at Saint Helena as the catalyst rather than more specifically any dispatches she may or may not have had on board.
A fact from Benjamin William Page appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 September 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Unclear sentence: "His family were on close terms with that of another Ipswich local, Rear-Admiral
Sir Edward Hughes, especially so his father, Reverend R. Leman, and his uncle, Reverend J. Leman." Comment: It's not clear from the sentence whether Rev. Leman is the father of Page or Hughes. If Leman is Page's father, why are their last names different? Is Page a step-son?
@
Djmaschek: Thanks for the review. Per the sources referenced in "Early life" and "Family", which are the only ones I've been able to locate that discuss his family in any detail: Page's father was the Rev. R. Leman and his uncle the Rev. J. Leman. His brother was named Samuel Page. He had nephews named Robert Leman Page, Samuel Flood Page, and Luke Flood Page, and nieces named Charlotte Page, Elizabeth Page, and Sophia Page. I think this demonstrates that the Leman and Page families were one and the same or at least connected through multiple marriages, however as of right now I have found no source that definitively says what the connection was. Putting his information into Ancestry actually provides a different set of parents but I've absolutely no sources to back that up. I'm going to keep looking in the hope that there will be something clearer out there!
Pickersgill-Cunliffe (
talk)
17:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Pickersgill-Cunliffe: Some people in these English families took the mother's name. That might occur if he inherited from his mother's family (see
Barnard Foord Bowes, Early career, paragraph 1). I asked the question because, if I was puzzled about this, other readers will probably be puzzled also.
Djmaschek (
talk)
18:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Djmaschek: Currently no idea who the mother was, unfortunately! Interestingly one thing I have come across in my search so far is a request for help from a historian in the 1800s who was also struggling to find members of Page's family! Will continue looking and hope to clarify as much as possible shortly (update: found a better source that provided details of parents - seems the other source I was using confused some different generations of his maternal family).
Pickersgill-Cunliffe (
talk)
18:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article is new enough and long enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. The image is fine. A QPQ has been completed. However, I don't see the hook in the article. I see "In May 1803 he was sent in the frigate, with secret orders announcing the start of the Napoleonic Wars, to the East Indies where his patron the now Vice-Admiral Rainier was still commander-in-chief." and "The war being very new, Page was able to use his awareness to his advantage". It seems likely to be the case, but that would be synthesis.
SL93 (
talk)
09:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Fair. Would changing the wording help? I agree on the synthesis point. An alternative:
It's unclear what war Sadras, Providien, Negapatam, and Trincomalee were part of - recommend making this clearer Done
" Page was appointed next to the frigate HMS Astraea on 19 October 1796 as her second lieutenant, serving on the Jamaica Station" - Do you mean 1786? Done - woops!
"He left Inflexible in February 1802 and went on half pay" - Is it known why? Semi-retirement, illness, excess of commanders over ships? Done - I can't categorically say why, but the timing coincides almost perfectly with the start of the
Peace of Amiens which saw government immediately start decommissioning ships to cut costs. I've added that he went on half pay as the Peace started but can't in good faith say any more.
Is De Haasje the same ship as the Batavian brig that became
HMS Phosphorus (1804)? If so, would a piped link be appropriate? Also, Page's
report in the London Gazette about the encounter with Haasje states that the ship's dispatches were thrown overboard. Marshall and O'Byrne both support the British knowing the dispatches though. Is there anything in other sources that would clarify this inconsistency with his Gazette report? Done - The ships are one and the same, thanks for bringing that to my attention, I'm amazed I wasn't already aware of it! The dispatches are a conundrum. It's possible that Page looked to hide the fact the dispatches had been taken intact, because the Gazette was an easily accessible publication by ally and enemy alike. Of course this is just conjecture, I've changed the text to focus more on the arrival of the ship itself at Saint Helena as the catalyst rather than more specifically any dispatches she may or may not have had on board.