![]() | This article is a current
featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to
meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{ Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() | Benjamin Jackson (sailor) ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 25 June 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Benjamin Jackson (sailor) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Benjamin Jackson (sailor) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 July 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
I am currently in the process of completely rewriting this article so it is more comprehensive and includes inline citations to more than one source. If anybody's interested, you can monitor my progress in my sandbox. Comment here if you'd like to contribute. Dugan Murphy ( talk) 02:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93
talk
02:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Dugan Murphy ( talk) 22:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
@ Avi8tor: You just posted to my talk page, but given the subject, I think it's more appropriate to reply here. You said:
Hello Dugan Murphy. I notice you removed the convert template for Benjamin Jackson (sailor), contrary to the Manual of style. Wikipedia's aim is educating readers worldwide, the
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Units of measurement, states: that except for the USA and the UK, "the primary units chosen will be SI units", with a convert template, so no matter where you live, the reader will understand the unit. I'll add the convert template again to the article. Best regards, Avi8tor (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I removed your addition of the convert template because I was applying MOS:TIES to numbers. But having read more of the MOS, I agree with you that MOS:UNIT seems to apply better to this question. Because you didn't cite the MOS in your edit summary, introduced a grammar issue, and didn't add it consistently throughout the article, it didn't look to me like an attempt to improve the article. I'll fix the consistency and grammar issues right now. In the end, I think the article will better match MOS guidelines for the combined effort. Thank you for helping to improve this article! Dugan Murphy ( talk) 14:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is a current
featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to
meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{ Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
![]() | Benjamin Jackson (sailor) ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 25 June 2024 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Benjamin Jackson (sailor) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Benjamin Jackson (sailor) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 July 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
I am currently in the process of completely rewriting this article so it is more comprehensive and includes inline citations to more than one source. If anybody's interested, you can monitor my progress in my sandbox. Comment here if you'd like to contribute. Dugan Murphy ( talk) 02:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93
talk
02:43, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Dugan Murphy ( talk) 22:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
@ Avi8tor: You just posted to my talk page, but given the subject, I think it's more appropriate to reply here. You said:
Hello Dugan Murphy. I notice you removed the convert template for Benjamin Jackson (sailor), contrary to the Manual of style. Wikipedia's aim is educating readers worldwide, the
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers/Units of measurement, states: that except for the USA and the UK, "the primary units chosen will be SI units", with a convert template, so no matter where you live, the reader will understand the unit. I'll add the convert template again to the article. Best regards, Avi8tor (talk) 05:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I removed your addition of the convert template because I was applying MOS:TIES to numbers. But having read more of the MOS, I agree with you that MOS:UNIT seems to apply better to this question. Because you didn't cite the MOS in your edit summary, introduced a grammar issue, and didn't add it consistently throughout the article, it didn't look to me like an attempt to improve the article. I'll fix the consistency and grammar issues right now. In the end, I think the article will better match MOS guidelines for the combined effort. Thank you for helping to improve this article! Dugan Murphy ( talk) 14:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)