GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: CaroleHenson ( talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm starting the review and will post it within a day or so.--
CaroleHenson (
talk)
03:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The article has been expanded significantly since early May when it was a tagged stub. It is stable and written with clear, concise prose. There are inline citations to reliable sources. There is no apparent original research. There is one image which is available and properly tagged in commons. There are a couple of items regarding the amount of detail in the intro and the Benjamin Church section - and use of quotations when paraphrasing is appropriate.
There's some information in the section that starts to stray away from the subject of the article - and some that is stated as quotes, but doesn't really need to. What do you think about something like:
Since the article is not long - and the summary doesn't need to have a lot of detail - what do you think about an introduction like:
I've posted the review for your consideration and input. The proposed wording, which is just a stab to give you something to consider.-- CaroleHenson ( talk) 07:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: CaroleHenson ( talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm starting the review and will post it within a day or so.--
CaroleHenson (
talk)
03:40, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
The article has been expanded significantly since early May when it was a tagged stub. It is stable and written with clear, concise prose. There are inline citations to reliable sources. There is no apparent original research. There is one image which is available and properly tagged in commons. There are a couple of items regarding the amount of detail in the intro and the Benjamin Church section - and use of quotations when paraphrasing is appropriate.
There's some information in the section that starts to stray away from the subject of the article - and some that is stated as quotes, but doesn't really need to. What do you think about something like:
Since the article is not long - and the summary doesn't need to have a lot of detail - what do you think about an introduction like:
I've posted the review for your consideration and input. The proposed wording, which is just a stab to give you something to consider.-- CaroleHenson ( talk) 07:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)