GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 21:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Cumberbatch is a legend - it will be good to review this! I'll leave down some initial comments within 48 hours and will focus on copy editing issues in the article. Thanks, ☠ Jag uar ☠ 21:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Sorry for coming to the review so late. I've been so busy at college... ☠ Jag uar ☠ 15:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I have made changes based on your suggestions. Hope it helps. Chocolate Charlie ( talk) 06:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
All references are in check - citations are in the correct places and every reference complies per the GA cirteria.
This is a well written article. The prose is generally good in the article and all references meet the GA criteria. The only problems I found with this were the organisation of the lead and a few minor copy editing issues I found in some sections I mentioned above. I'll put this article on hold for the standard seven days. Sorry for reviewing this so late, I had no idea I would be that busy! ☠ Jag uar ☠ 15:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
My time and internet access is very limited (this hospital doesn't have connection) so I'm going to have to keep this brief. I don't see any problems with the article now, it seems all of my concerns have been attended to. It now meets the GA criteria. Thank you and well done on doing it so quickly. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 17:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 21:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Cumberbatch is a legend - it will be good to review this! I'll leave down some initial comments within 48 hours and will focus on copy editing issues in the article. Thanks, ☠ Jag uar ☠ 21:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Sorry for coming to the review so late. I've been so busy at college... ☠ Jag uar ☠ 15:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
I have made changes based on your suggestions. Hope it helps. Chocolate Charlie ( talk) 06:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
All references are in check - citations are in the correct places and every reference complies per the GA cirteria.
This is a well written article. The prose is generally good in the article and all references meet the GA criteria. The only problems I found with this were the organisation of the lead and a few minor copy editing issues I found in some sections I mentioned above. I'll put this article on hold for the standard seven days. Sorry for reviewing this so late, I had no idea I would be that busy! ☠ Jag uar ☠ 15:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
My time and internet access is very limited (this hospital doesn't have connection) so I'm going to have to keep this brief. I don't see any problems with the article now, it seems all of my concerns have been attended to. It now meets the GA criteria. Thank you and well done on doing it so quickly. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 17:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)