This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

This article could do with a photograph. If you have one, please upload it. Wikiwayman ( talk) 14:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply

The EPA factsheet includes the phrase "thrash pilot testing", which I've never heard of professionally. A recent IP edit here removed the word "thrash" to leave "pilot testing" and thus avoid confusion. An internet search reveals that most results returned for that exact phrase "thrash pilot testing" have the exact same wording as the factsheet. Is this a meaningless phrase that this WP article should avoid using, or does it actually mean something specific? Wikiwayman ( talk) 12:52, 11 May 2015 (UTC) reply