This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to
classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the
guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the
project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Bells Across the Meadows appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 August 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I check pages listed in
Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
Bells Across the Meadows's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
AnomieBOT⚡17:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The article calls "Characteristic Intermezzo" a subtitle, but having seen the image of the original sheet music that was just added to the article, I think it might instead be a genre or type of piece, much like a symphony, sonata, or intermezzo—in this case, a specific type of intermezzo. This is something that should be considered; perhaps a review or other article about the piece might discuss this very issue.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
01:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Thanks,
Softlavender. Good to know. I wonder whether "oriental phantasy", then, for the Chinese piece mentioned above, it also a genre, albeit one even more rare than "characteristic intermezzo". If it were "oriental fantasy", I'd consider it quite likely, since "fantasy"/"fantasia" is itself a genre.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
03:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you for helping with language for types of music I never heard. They seemed rather special phrases. I am just afraid that some readers may also have never heard them, and that the "übergeordnete" (?) light music is more readily understood. What do you think? --
Gerda Arendt (
talk)
07:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Hi Gerda, I think the point that BlueMoonset was making is that subtitled Characteristic Intermezzo is (at least somewhat) inaccurate -- that's not a subtitle, it's just a descriptor, plus it has the word "A" before the descriptor (see the sheet music). Wikipedia should not state subtitled Characteristic Intermezzo, although we could state subtitled A Characteristic Intermezzo, or called a "characteristic intermezzo" by the composer, or called a "
characteristicintermezzo" by the composer. I agree the main genre (for the lede, etc.) is light music--
Softlavender (
talk)
07:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I question whether the so-called "subtitle" should be in the infobox. It's a bit unnecessary, awkward, and confusing. In my mind it's not really the subtitle, as I mentioned above. It's a bit like when when novels have "A Novel" on the book cover so people will know it's not a nonfiction book. For example The Da Vinci Code: A Novel. We don't include "A Novel" as the so-called "subtitle" of The Da Vinci Code anywhere in that article, even though it's clearly on the book cover:
[3]. --
Softlavender (
talk)
11:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
1. I have now read the quote from Gavin Bryars several times and have no idea what on earth it is supposed to mean. And I very much doubt that he did, either. I gently suggest deleting it.
2. I have always heard the Ketelby was inspired to write this piece by bells he heard in Malta. I just found
this, e.g.
3. For what it's worth, no musical dictionary I am aware of lists 'characteristic intermezzo' as a form or genre, and unless anyone can show different, the words 'A characteristic intermezzo' are undoubtedly a subtitle, not a formal descriptor. The example of Dan Brown is imo rather futile (as is anything connected to Dan Brown for that matter). Perhaps more relevant would be, e.g. H G. Wells's Love and Mr. Lewisham. The author appended to his title: "The Story of a Very Young Couple". It is, indeed, the story of a very young couple, but that doesn't prevent those words being a subtitle. See also Conrad's The Secret Agent: "A Simple Tale". These sorts of subtitles were common in English fiction in the Victorian and Edwardian era and were regarded as a relevant (and sometimes self-mocking) part of the titling of the work. The same, I suggest, without any self-mockery, is true in the present case.
Smerus (
talk)
15:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Agree on the quotation -- I have removed it and replaced it with a better one. In terms of the Malta rumor, the linked account is quite vague and even doubts itself. Plus it is refuted here by an investigative scholar and Ketelbey expert:
[4]. It appears to be merely an unfounded rumor perpetuated by the citizens of Gozo.
Softlavender (
talk)
08:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to
classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the
guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the
project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from Bells Across the Meadows appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 August 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I check pages listed in
Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
Bells Across the Meadows's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
AnomieBOT⚡17:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The article calls "Characteristic Intermezzo" a subtitle, but having seen the image of the original sheet music that was just added to the article, I think it might instead be a genre or type of piece, much like a symphony, sonata, or intermezzo—in this case, a specific type of intermezzo. This is something that should be considered; perhaps a review or other article about the piece might discuss this very issue.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
01:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Thanks,
Softlavender. Good to know. I wonder whether "oriental phantasy", then, for the Chinese piece mentioned above, it also a genre, albeit one even more rare than "characteristic intermezzo". If it were "oriental fantasy", I'd consider it quite likely, since "fantasy"/"fantasia" is itself a genre.
BlueMoonset (
talk)
03:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Thank you for helping with language for types of music I never heard. They seemed rather special phrases. I am just afraid that some readers may also have never heard them, and that the "übergeordnete" (?) light music is more readily understood. What do you think? --
Gerda Arendt (
talk)
07:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Hi Gerda, I think the point that BlueMoonset was making is that subtitled Characteristic Intermezzo is (at least somewhat) inaccurate -- that's not a subtitle, it's just a descriptor, plus it has the word "A" before the descriptor (see the sheet music). Wikipedia should not state subtitled Characteristic Intermezzo, although we could state subtitled A Characteristic Intermezzo, or called a "characteristic intermezzo" by the composer, or called a "
characteristicintermezzo" by the composer. I agree the main genre (for the lede, etc.) is light music--
Softlavender (
talk)
07:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
I question whether the so-called "subtitle" should be in the infobox. It's a bit unnecessary, awkward, and confusing. In my mind it's not really the subtitle, as I mentioned above. It's a bit like when when novels have "A Novel" on the book cover so people will know it's not a nonfiction book. For example The Da Vinci Code: A Novel. We don't include "A Novel" as the so-called "subtitle" of The Da Vinci Code anywhere in that article, even though it's clearly on the book cover:
[3]. --
Softlavender (
talk)
11:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
1. I have now read the quote from Gavin Bryars several times and have no idea what on earth it is supposed to mean. And I very much doubt that he did, either. I gently suggest deleting it.
2. I have always heard the Ketelby was inspired to write this piece by bells he heard in Malta. I just found
this, e.g.
3. For what it's worth, no musical dictionary I am aware of lists 'characteristic intermezzo' as a form or genre, and unless anyone can show different, the words 'A characteristic intermezzo' are undoubtedly a subtitle, not a formal descriptor. The example of Dan Brown is imo rather futile (as is anything connected to Dan Brown for that matter). Perhaps more relevant would be, e.g. H G. Wells's Love and Mr. Lewisham. The author appended to his title: "The Story of a Very Young Couple". It is, indeed, the story of a very young couple, but that doesn't prevent those words being a subtitle. See also Conrad's The Secret Agent: "A Simple Tale". These sorts of subtitles were common in English fiction in the Victorian and Edwardian era and were regarded as a relevant (and sometimes self-mocking) part of the titling of the work. The same, I suggest, without any self-mockery, is true in the present case.
Smerus (
talk)
15:43, 10 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Agree on the quotation -- I have removed it and replaced it with a better one. In terms of the Malta rumor, the linked account is quite vague and even doubts itself. Plus it is refuted here by an investigative scholar and Ketelbey expert:
[4]. It appears to be merely an unfounded rumor perpetuated by the citizens of Gozo.
Softlavender (
talk)
08:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)reply