This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moving text to here so discussion can be had:
And where are the sources for these claims exactly? There is 1 source relating to the issue and doesnt contain most of this. Timeshift ( talk) 03:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Just had a look at this article after recent press today about her. This really has been whitewashed big time. This needs to be put back up. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.209.161.195 (
talk)
23:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Problem is, that's no even close to a summary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.161.195 ( talk) 01:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
The cited source says "The management of a Gosford nightclub has retracted all staff statements in an apology to a NSW minister and his federal MP wife, denying the couple were abusive and threatening during an altercation on Friday night." If there's no source for the alleged repeated "f******"'s, they can't appear in the article anyway. They can't stay on this talk page either. - Pointillist ( talk) 01:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
References
The following sentence has been proposed for inclusion, but presents a problem:
The problem is the journalist states unequivocally that the ALP will not preselect Neal in 2010, but then doesn't back the claim with anything other than a single sentence from a "well-placed source". Far be it for me to impugn the accuracy of Daily Telegraph reporting, but if the ALP had made a decision on the Robertson preselection in 2010 there would surely be a statement attributable to the ALP on which to base it. The story would also have received wider coverage than this one line of anonymous speculation in a single newspaper article. A check of the ALP state and Federal websites makes clear no preselections have been conducted or contemplated for the 2010 election.
Inclusion of this claim in the article would in my opinion place undue weight on the views of an anonymous comment in a single line of a newspaper article about a decision that no official source supports. Given this is an encyclopedia article and not a blog, I'd suggest we let the dust settle a touch before rushing to include this claim. Euryalus ( talk) 22:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
The ALP has refuted the speculation. WWGB ( talk) 03:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like Bishop and Nelson need a tissue if you ask me, it is a complete storm in a teacup. Note how it happened a week ago but Bishop only brought it to light upon Neal being cleared of any wrongdoing? Timeshift ( talk) 04:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Belinda Neal. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belinda Neal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
There was a disputed tag on the page since 2016 but no explanation here, so I removed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:31A6:BE00:44E1:1E3C:537:6DEE ( talk) 05:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moving text to here so discussion can be had:
And where are the sources for these claims exactly? There is 1 source relating to the issue and doesnt contain most of this. Timeshift ( talk) 03:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Just had a look at this article after recent press today about her. This really has been whitewashed big time. This needs to be put back up. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.209.161.195 (
talk)
23:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
Problem is, that's no even close to a summary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.209.161.195 ( talk) 01:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
The cited source says "The management of a Gosford nightclub has retracted all staff statements in an apology to a NSW minister and his federal MP wife, denying the couple were abusive and threatening during an altercation on Friday night." If there's no source for the alleged repeated "f******"'s, they can't appear in the article anyway. They can't stay on this talk page either. - Pointillist ( talk) 01:21, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
References
The following sentence has been proposed for inclusion, but presents a problem:
The problem is the journalist states unequivocally that the ALP will not preselect Neal in 2010, but then doesn't back the claim with anything other than a single sentence from a "well-placed source". Far be it for me to impugn the accuracy of Daily Telegraph reporting, but if the ALP had made a decision on the Robertson preselection in 2010 there would surely be a statement attributable to the ALP on which to base it. The story would also have received wider coverage than this one line of anonymous speculation in a single newspaper article. A check of the ALP state and Federal websites makes clear no preselections have been conducted or contemplated for the 2010 election.
Inclusion of this claim in the article would in my opinion place undue weight on the views of an anonymous comment in a single line of a newspaper article about a decision that no official source supports. Given this is an encyclopedia article and not a blog, I'd suggest we let the dust settle a touch before rushing to include this claim. Euryalus ( talk) 22:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
The ALP has refuted the speculation. WWGB ( talk) 03:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like Bishop and Nelson need a tissue if you ask me, it is a complete storm in a teacup. Note how it happened a week ago but Bishop only brought it to light upon Neal being cleared of any wrongdoing? Timeshift ( talk) 04:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Belinda Neal. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Belinda Neal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
There was a disputed tag on the page since 2016 but no explanation here, so I removed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:44B8:31A6:BE00:44E1:1E3C:537:6DEE ( talk) 05:00, 19 May 2018 (UTC)