This redirect is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
The name of the entry
As far as I can see, this entry covers the Bedford QLB, the Bedford QLR, the Bedford QLT the Bedford QLD and ... the Bedford QL. It may have started out as just a (very short) article on the QLD, but that's not how it looks now. I guess if you had enough information and time you could set up five or six different entries on each of the different Bedford QLs. But that's a big job for someone with access to unusual sources. Meantime, would it not make sense to rename the entry the Bedford QL?
Regards
Charles01 (
talk) 17:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)reply
This redirect is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
The name of the entry
As far as I can see, this entry covers the Bedford QLB, the Bedford QLR, the Bedford QLT the Bedford QLD and ... the Bedford QL. It may have started out as just a (very short) article on the QLD, but that's not how it looks now. I guess if you had enough information and time you could set up five or six different entries on each of the different Bedford QLs. But that's a big job for someone with access to unusual sources. Meantime, would it not make sense to rename the entry the Bedford QL?
Regards
Charles01 (
talk) 17:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)reply
.jpg){kind=small}