| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I couldn't revise the page because of the recent editings but I removed the unnecessary things. I tagged the page since this was the second time I had to remove vandalism and the Page History says it has had to be fixed several times.
-- Talensis 13:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think I have got the page back to an unvandalised state. If you could check it over for detail then that would be good.
How do you expect people to leave this article alone when it's so poorly written, and obviously fabricated? Matariel ( talk) 18:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I couldn't revise the page because of the recent editings but I removed the unnecessary things. I tagged the page since this was the second time I had to remove vandalism and the Page History says it has had to be fixed several times.
-- Talensis 13:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think I have got the page back to an unvandalised state. If you could check it over for detail then that would be good.
How do you expect people to leave this article alone when it's so poorly written, and obviously fabricated? Matariel ( talk) 18:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC)