This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The image Image:Franz Ferdinand - This Fffire.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know enough about fair use to make a substantive contribution here, but this article is fairly barren without the image in question.-- 65.212.104.138 ( talk) 21:12, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, we really need an art major or art history major to add a little detail to the description of the design. Is this Constructivist, or Primativism or what? Was this kind of artwork typical of the Russian Revolutionary period? If so, why?
Thanks to all who improve this entry.
72.184.227.106 ( talk) 21:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I did change the image for a better one. I wonder what is the meaning of "original poster". Of course one should revert my edit if the former image was more "original". (Which I doubt, for the lack of borders.) -- Dominique Meeùs ( talk) 21:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The image Image:Franz Ferdinand - This Fffire.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
I don't know enough about fair use to make a substantive contribution here, but this article is fairly barren without the image in question.-- 65.212.104.138 ( talk) 21:12, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey, we really need an art major or art history major to add a little detail to the description of the design. Is this Constructivist, or Primativism or what? Was this kind of artwork typical of the Russian Revolutionary period? If so, why?
Thanks to all who improve this entry.
72.184.227.106 ( talk) 21:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
I did change the image for a better one. I wonder what is the meaning of "original poster". Of course one should revert my edit if the former image was more "original". (Which I doubt, for the lack of borders.) -- Dominique Meeùs ( talk) 21:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)