This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
I fully support the proposal to merge, and say that if there are no objections to the merger then I will do it on or around January 1, 2009.
Cndrblck (
talk)
00:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I can positively say that Mag.MO5.com is a reliable source. Guillaume Verdin (who wrote the article currently in use) previously wrote a feature for French magazine Pix'n Love and he is currently a freelance writer at the French gaming website Gamekult (Here is his resume
[1 ]).
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Looking at it, the artists seem to be cited by the credits, which I feel is insufficient. Can you find any sources that confirm they work on the game besides the game's credits?
I used a review of the game by German magazine MAN!AC (which list the staff in their review at the top
[2 ]) as reference. I did use the game's credit as reference (an example i followed by other editors at Wikipedia) to clarify their exact roles.
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The claim that the AI is "more helpful" than in Cybermorph needs stronger citation attached.
I rearranged the sentence (P.S. If another retrospecitve review ever pops up that mentions what was originally mentioned in the gameplay section, i'll reintroduce it, but i think the sentence will be fine without it for the time being).
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
atarijaguar website should just be replaced with the tweet of Rob's citing his participation
Since there is a book which mentions Rob Bryden's participation in the game, i decided to remove the reference. Keep in mind that the atarijaguar.co.uk was originally hosted by Tom Charnock, a freelance games journalist (
[3 ]). I've seen the work of Charnock previously in Retro Gamer magazine.
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Receptions section should be paraphrased more in places, such as the GamePro sentence
Doing some quick research put my initial thoughts to rest: Turns out that The Atari Times was originally a newsletter started by the reviewer (Gregory D. George) back in 1996 (
4 ]). It seems they transitioned to an online format sometime in the 90s or in the 2000s.
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
I fully support the proposal to merge, and say that if there are no objections to the merger then I will do it on or around January 1, 2009.
Cndrblck (
talk)
00:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I can positively say that Mag.MO5.com is a reliable source. Guillaume Verdin (who wrote the article currently in use) previously wrote a feature for French magazine Pix'n Love and he is currently a freelance writer at the French gaming website Gamekult (Here is his resume
[1 ]).
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Looking at it, the artists seem to be cited by the credits, which I feel is insufficient. Can you find any sources that confirm they work on the game besides the game's credits?
I used a review of the game by German magazine MAN!AC (which list the staff in their review at the top
[2 ]) as reference. I did use the game's credit as reference (an example i followed by other editors at Wikipedia) to clarify their exact roles.
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The claim that the AI is "more helpful" than in Cybermorph needs stronger citation attached.
I rearranged the sentence (P.S. If another retrospecitve review ever pops up that mentions what was originally mentioned in the gameplay section, i'll reintroduce it, but i think the sentence will be fine without it for the time being).
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
atarijaguar website should just be replaced with the tweet of Rob's citing his participation
Since there is a book which mentions Rob Bryden's participation in the game, i decided to remove the reference. Keep in mind that the atarijaguar.co.uk was originally hosted by Tom Charnock, a freelance games journalist (
[3 ]). I've seen the work of Charnock previously in Retro Gamer magazine.
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Receptions section should be paraphrased more in places, such as the GamePro sentence
Doing some quick research put my initial thoughts to rest: Turns out that The Atari Times was originally a newsletter started by the reviewer (Gregory D. George) back in 1996 (
4 ]). It seems they transitioned to an online format sometime in the 90s or in the 2000s.
Roberth Martinez (
talk)
21:26, 23 May 2023 (UTC)reply