![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 20, 2014, October 20, 2016, October 20, 2018, October 20, 2019, October 20, 2021, and October 20, 2022. |
On some picks from Sirte front there were Libyan NTC tanks, should we add information in infobox about that? Now there are only information about technicals.-- Vojvodae please be free to write :) 20:49, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
How come we claim the NTC "captured" the airport while in the same sentence admitting they are being shelled from the other end of the runway. Since when does not a runway part of an airport constitute? I propose we move the text to one along the lines:
The Sirte military airport has two X runways and is 3km * 4km big with tens of fortifications. It isn't just a piece of tarmac in the middle of the desert as most other Libyan airports. 94.113.101.38 ( talk) 13:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Is it just me, or do we need a battle map covering the city like the ones we had for Misrata and Tripoli? - Kudzu1 ( talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I support the proposal for the map but also think a few images of the fighting would come a long way of properly representing the battle in this article. EkoGraf ( talk) 20:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
This map File:Sirte-8.10.2011.png should be preserved as it is without any changes so it could show the situation as of 8 October 2011. EkoGraf ( talk) 03:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't really like the colors. Red is usually associated with danger and evil, so maybe that could change (maybe in blue)? Jrdplas ( talk) 15:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Now that the battle is over, I would suggest that the map be reverted to show the battle lines as of the start of the conflict. -- Sacolcor ( talk) 17:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I strongly object against such arbitrary naming. It is obvious from the beginning of this conflict that the forces fighting Gaddafi Loyalists and former Libyan Army are NOT controlled or even fully supporting the NTC. This stinks of PR even though I believe the result was not intentional. If we indeed keep the NTC moniker for all forces fighting the previous regime, then I require all "pro-Gaddafi/Loyalist" monikers should be changed to "Libyan Army" or "Jamahirya forces". This goes for all Libyan War articles, basically. 195.212.29.190 ( talk) 08:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Today reports say that Al-Mu'tasim-Billah al-Gaddaf is not captured.-- Vojvodae please be free to write :) 18:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
The Fourth opposition attack has, according to the article, been going on from oct 4 and is still on. Its seems the fighting has stopped a few times during this time. At least the attack must have stopped yesterday oct 13 when the NTC-forces were pushed back and they started a siege again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.241.33 ( talk) 12:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I am considering that the fourth attack in essence lasted until 12 October when they managed to bottle up the loyalists in the two districts. Since the 13th in essence is a new siege. EkoGraf ( talk) 20:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
In the article its said that Bani Walid has fallen. The NTC took that back later on oct 18th, saying that they had only entered the city and had taken some ground. That was reported by fighters from Misrata witch had been transferred from Sirte. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.241.33 ( talk) 07:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Sirte-8.10.2011.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Sirte (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://inagist.com/Sirte_Feb17/118375049920122881/Confirmed_news_that_Gaddafis_nephew,_AbdelRahman_AbdelHamid,_was_killed_in_SirteWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Battle of Sirte (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/world/2011/10/libyans-face-heavy-resistance-gadhafi-hometown{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.france24.com/en/20111012-fighters-move-kill-kadhafi-townWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 20, 2014, October 20, 2016, October 20, 2018, October 20, 2019, October 20, 2021, and October 20, 2022. |
On some picks from Sirte front there were Libyan NTC tanks, should we add information in infobox about that? Now there are only information about technicals.-- Vojvodae please be free to write :) 20:49, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
How come we claim the NTC "captured" the airport while in the same sentence admitting they are being shelled from the other end of the runway. Since when does not a runway part of an airport constitute? I propose we move the text to one along the lines:
The Sirte military airport has two X runways and is 3km * 4km big with tens of fortifications. It isn't just a piece of tarmac in the middle of the desert as most other Libyan airports. 94.113.101.38 ( talk) 13:36, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Is it just me, or do we need a battle map covering the city like the ones we had for Misrata and Tripoli? - Kudzu1 ( talk) 15:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I support the proposal for the map but also think a few images of the fighting would come a long way of properly representing the battle in this article. EkoGraf ( talk) 20:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
This map File:Sirte-8.10.2011.png should be preserved as it is without any changes so it could show the situation as of 8 October 2011. EkoGraf ( talk) 03:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't really like the colors. Red is usually associated with danger and evil, so maybe that could change (maybe in blue)? Jrdplas ( talk) 15:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Now that the battle is over, I would suggest that the map be reverted to show the battle lines as of the start of the conflict. -- Sacolcor ( talk) 17:55, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
I strongly object against such arbitrary naming. It is obvious from the beginning of this conflict that the forces fighting Gaddafi Loyalists and former Libyan Army are NOT controlled or even fully supporting the NTC. This stinks of PR even though I believe the result was not intentional. If we indeed keep the NTC moniker for all forces fighting the previous regime, then I require all "pro-Gaddafi/Loyalist" monikers should be changed to "Libyan Army" or "Jamahirya forces". This goes for all Libyan War articles, basically. 195.212.29.190 ( talk) 08:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Today reports say that Al-Mu'tasim-Billah al-Gaddaf is not captured.-- Vojvodae please be free to write :) 18:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
The Fourth opposition attack has, according to the article, been going on from oct 4 and is still on. Its seems the fighting has stopped a few times during this time. At least the attack must have stopped yesterday oct 13 when the NTC-forces were pushed back and they started a siege again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.241.33 ( talk) 12:47, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I am considering that the fourth attack in essence lasted until 12 October when they managed to bottle up the loyalists in the two districts. Since the 13th in essence is a new siege. EkoGraf ( talk) 20:39, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
In the article its said that Bani Walid has fallen. The NTC took that back later on oct 18th, saying that they had only entered the city and had taken some ground. That was reported by fighters from Misrata witch had been transferred from Sirte. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.241.33 ( talk) 07:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Sirte-8.10.2011.png, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Sirte (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://inagist.com/Sirte_Feb17/118375049920122881/Confirmed_news_that_Gaddafis_nephew,_AbdelRahman_AbdelHamid,_was_killed_in_SirteWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Battle of Sirte (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://washingtonexaminer.com/news/world/2011/10/libyans-face-heavy-resistance-gadhafi-hometown{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.france24.com/en/20111012-fighters-move-kill-kadhafi-townWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)