This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Though the first sentence clearly explains that the title "massacre" was bestowed by Americans, does anyone else think that the title represents a clear anti-British bias that may cause misconceptions about what really happened? -- queso man 18:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I am not clear why "Battle of Paoli" is favoured over " Battle of Paoli Tavern." Despite common usage, there is no place called Paoli and indeed, no longer any Paoli Tavern to explain the reference. Would it not be more appropriate to use the correct geographical reference used at the time and tag the abbreviated "Battle of Paoli" as a secondary? JF42 ( talk) 08:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The light companies of the other two British regiments may well have been "attached to" the 2nd Light Inf. for the purposes of this attack, but that would not truly make them "part of" it.
Terry J. Carter ( talk) 21:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
As of today, 22 November 2009, the article indicates that the British incurred nine casualties, including five wounded. The partial list of casualties of the Battle of Paoli provided by Independence Hall Association indicates at least eight British wounded. What is the source of the figure of "5 wounded"? – BLACK FALCON ( TALK) 01:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
"To show their defiance, the Light Companies of the 46th and 49th Foot, who were both part of the 2nd Light Infantry, dyed their hat feathers red so the Americans would be able to identify them."
This is a tradition for which there is no contemporary evidence, nor is there any evidence for the next fifty-six years that a red light company feather had either been adopted by or authorised for either of these regiments, although company feathers were only recognised officially in 1800. In 1833, on their return from India the 46th Regt were asked by the Adjutant General, why their Light Company were wearing red cap distinctions as opposed to the regulation green for Light Infantry. Their answer has not survived but it was presumably the basis of the account recorded in an official regimental history published eighteen years later,A Historical Record of the Forty-Sixth Regiment by Richard Cannon. This brought to the public's attention the story of red feathers being adopted after Paoli by the men of the 2nd Light Infantry Battalion, including the light infantrymen of the 46th and 49th Regts. In 1858 Light Companies in infantry regiments were abolished and thenceforth the 46th and their successors, through numerous amalgamations, commemorated the Paoli action with a red headress distinction for all ranks until 2006, although since the late 19th century it had tended to be associated more in the popular imagination with the battle of Brandywine Creek.
The 49th Regiment did not claim a tradition of wearing red feathers after the American war but ca.1842 a 'Digest of Service', compiled to replace lost Regimental records, made garbled reference to their light company being ordered to wear a red feather during the AWI. It was not until 1934 that the Royal Berkshire Regt, inheritor of the 49th Regt's traditions, was granted the right to wear a red distinction in their head dress. No doubt influenced by the way the 46th tradition had mutated, this was expressly "to commemorate the part played by the light company of the 49th Regt at Brandywine Creek", although an accompanying narrative in the Regimental magazine shows the action at Paoli Tavern had not been forgotten although it was not named. Thenceforth the Royal Berkshires and their descendants wore the 'Brandywine distinction' or 'Brandywine Flash' in their headress until 2006. There is no clear explanation why out of thirteen regiments represented in the 2nd L.I. Bn, these two regiments alone ended up commemorating the Paoli Tavern action in this way. The 'red hackle' of the Black Watch (42nd Royal Highland Regt) has also been dated to this period by one problematic source but never associated with Paoli or the 'red feather tradition of the 46th and 49th Regts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JF42 ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC) -- JF42 ( talk) 13:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
"At 10 p.m. on September 20, British commander Major General Charles Grey marched from the British camp, and launched a surprise attack on Wayne's camp, near the General Paoli Tavern, from which the battle takes its name, located near present-day Malvern."
The battle took place in Malvern or in Paoli or somewhere else. Can't it be more closely located than near Malvern.
Nitpyck (
talk)
17:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
"To ensure that the Americans were not alerted, Grey had the flints removed from his troops’ muskets"
This anecdote is part of the folk-lore that has grown up around the battle.
As reported by Major John Andre, General Grey ordered that the troops should attack with unloaded muskets, or, in the case where the loads could not be drawn, that flints should be removed from the weapons.
JF42 ( talk) 10:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
In the opening paragraph it reads:
However later in the article it mentions over American 200 casualties, and only nine British ones. Does it not stand to reason thet the first descriptor was a misprint and meant to read - "Although there were relatively few BRITISH casualties, claims were made that the British took no prisoners and granted no quarter,"? 108.52.237.79 ( talk) 02:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Though the first sentence clearly explains that the title "massacre" was bestowed by Americans, does anyone else think that the title represents a clear anti-British bias that may cause misconceptions about what really happened? -- queso man 18:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I am not clear why "Battle of Paoli" is favoured over " Battle of Paoli Tavern." Despite common usage, there is no place called Paoli and indeed, no longer any Paoli Tavern to explain the reference. Would it not be more appropriate to use the correct geographical reference used at the time and tag the abbreviated "Battle of Paoli" as a secondary? JF42 ( talk) 08:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The light companies of the other two British regiments may well have been "attached to" the 2nd Light Inf. for the purposes of this attack, but that would not truly make them "part of" it.
Terry J. Carter ( talk) 21:52, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
As of today, 22 November 2009, the article indicates that the British incurred nine casualties, including five wounded. The partial list of casualties of the Battle of Paoli provided by Independence Hall Association indicates at least eight British wounded. What is the source of the figure of "5 wounded"? – BLACK FALCON ( TALK) 01:36, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
"To show their defiance, the Light Companies of the 46th and 49th Foot, who were both part of the 2nd Light Infantry, dyed their hat feathers red so the Americans would be able to identify them."
This is a tradition for which there is no contemporary evidence, nor is there any evidence for the next fifty-six years that a red light company feather had either been adopted by or authorised for either of these regiments, although company feathers were only recognised officially in 1800. In 1833, on their return from India the 46th Regt were asked by the Adjutant General, why their Light Company were wearing red cap distinctions as opposed to the regulation green for Light Infantry. Their answer has not survived but it was presumably the basis of the account recorded in an official regimental history published eighteen years later,A Historical Record of the Forty-Sixth Regiment by Richard Cannon. This brought to the public's attention the story of red feathers being adopted after Paoli by the men of the 2nd Light Infantry Battalion, including the light infantrymen of the 46th and 49th Regts. In 1858 Light Companies in infantry regiments were abolished and thenceforth the 46th and their successors, through numerous amalgamations, commemorated the Paoli action with a red headress distinction for all ranks until 2006, although since the late 19th century it had tended to be associated more in the popular imagination with the battle of Brandywine Creek.
The 49th Regiment did not claim a tradition of wearing red feathers after the American war but ca.1842 a 'Digest of Service', compiled to replace lost Regimental records, made garbled reference to their light company being ordered to wear a red feather during the AWI. It was not until 1934 that the Royal Berkshire Regt, inheritor of the 49th Regt's traditions, was granted the right to wear a red distinction in their head dress. No doubt influenced by the way the 46th tradition had mutated, this was expressly "to commemorate the part played by the light company of the 49th Regt at Brandywine Creek", although an accompanying narrative in the Regimental magazine shows the action at Paoli Tavern had not been forgotten although it was not named. Thenceforth the Royal Berkshires and their descendants wore the 'Brandywine distinction' or 'Brandywine Flash' in their headress until 2006. There is no clear explanation why out of thirteen regiments represented in the 2nd L.I. Bn, these two regiments alone ended up commemorating the Paoli Tavern action in this way. The 'red hackle' of the Black Watch (42nd Royal Highland Regt) has also been dated to this period by one problematic source but never associated with Paoli or the 'red feather tradition of the 46th and 49th Regts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JF42 ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 14 April 2010 (UTC) -- JF42 ( talk) 13:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
"At 10 p.m. on September 20, British commander Major General Charles Grey marched from the British camp, and launched a surprise attack on Wayne's camp, near the General Paoli Tavern, from which the battle takes its name, located near present-day Malvern."
The battle took place in Malvern or in Paoli or somewhere else. Can't it be more closely located than near Malvern.
Nitpyck (
talk)
17:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
"To ensure that the Americans were not alerted, Grey had the flints removed from his troops’ muskets"
This anecdote is part of the folk-lore that has grown up around the battle.
As reported by Major John Andre, General Grey ordered that the troops should attack with unloaded muskets, or, in the case where the loads could not be drawn, that flints should be removed from the weapons.
JF42 ( talk) 10:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
In the opening paragraph it reads:
However later in the article it mentions over American 200 casualties, and only nine British ones. Does it not stand to reason thet the first descriptor was a misprint and meant to read - "Although there were relatively few BRITISH casualties, claims were made that the British took no prisoners and granted no quarter,"? 108.52.237.79 ( talk) 02:57, 9 January 2020 (UTC)