This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Roman & Byzantine / Classical Start‑class This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This redirect does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Roman and Byzantine military history task force Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD) Phoenicia Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There was no separate battle of Carmona. As the "lead" to this article explains, it is just Appian's name for the battle of Ilipa. As such I would normally be proposing a merge, with "battle of Cremona" turned into a redirect. That is still what I am proposing to do, but as there is no usable, or even sourced, text in this article, it will be a "merge" in name only. Any opinions or comments regarding this? Gog the Mild ( talk) 22:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC) reply