This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Al Mahbes (1985) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! |
Saying result is Military stalemate is basically saying Battle of the Bulge was stalemate , same with Battle of Arnhem for example , they weren't stalemate , the side defensive achieve their objective , defending their zone In this case FAR manage to Drive away the attackers , it is Not stalemate And This attack did shows that the Polisario can't wage conventional warfare as they couldn't handle heavy casualties , Not other way around , that's why they never attack wall directly using consecrated force since 1985 , otherwise they would just keep launching attacks into they liberated their land . — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABIDALAA ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
i am only surprised that it only became issue when i done it , nothing more , also using that logic , German basically won battle of bulge because they initially breach their defensive , ignoring that they were driving back , as wall main objective is turn Polisario into conventional warfare instead of guerilla warfare tactics , something that happen in this battle , that's why they never attempted breach after 1985 . i would be grateful if you removed last conclusion of battle , it is POV and without source as well ABIDALAA ( talk
2) not really that seems appropriate example in military history , or other examples of defender driving attacker away and consider victory instead of Stalemate 3) can i have some of those source , breaching wall at will same as this battle , 4) thanks
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Al Mahbes (1985) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Wikipedians in Africa may be able to help! |
Saying result is Military stalemate is basically saying Battle of the Bulge was stalemate , same with Battle of Arnhem for example , they weren't stalemate , the side defensive achieve their objective , defending their zone In this case FAR manage to Drive away the attackers , it is Not stalemate And This attack did shows that the Polisario can't wage conventional warfare as they couldn't handle heavy casualties , Not other way around , that's why they never attack wall directly using consecrated force since 1985 , otherwise they would just keep launching attacks into they liberated their land . — Preceding unsigned comment added by ABIDALAA ( talk • contribs) 20:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
i am only surprised that it only became issue when i done it , nothing more , also using that logic , German basically won battle of bulge because they initially breach their defensive , ignoring that they were driving back , as wall main objective is turn Polisario into conventional warfare instead of guerilla warfare tactics , something that happen in this battle , that's why they never attempted breach after 1985 . i would be grateful if you removed last conclusion of battle , it is POV and without source as well ABIDALAA ( talk
2) not really that seems appropriate example in military history , or other examples of defender driving attacker away and consider victory instead of Stalemate 3) can i have some of those source , breaching wall at will same as this battle , 4) thanks