This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Aksu (717) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The accuracy of the "Background" section is significantly at odds with other, better-referenced articles, such as Principality of Farghana, which states:
In addition, it is also clear that the Battle of Aksu errs in using ikhshi as a personal name, i.e. it is a title like king or prince.
Grant | Talk 04:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with the above, for such a unique part of history seems like a fairly neglected article, perhaps someone familiar with the sources takes another look at it? Army strengths mentioned, for example. 129.78.56.155 ( talk) 02:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
It seems unlikely that the Ummayads, even with Tibetan allies, could have a force of 250,000 in a region so far from their centre of power. 180.150.38.34 ( talk) 09:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Aksu (717) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The accuracy of the "Background" section is significantly at odds with other, better-referenced articles, such as Principality of Farghana, which states:
In addition, it is also clear that the Battle of Aksu errs in using ikhshi as a personal name, i.e. it is a title like king or prince.
Grant | Talk 04:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with the above, for such a unique part of history seems like a fairly neglected article, perhaps someone familiar with the sources takes another look at it? Army strengths mentioned, for example. 129.78.56.155 ( talk) 02:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
It seems unlikely that the Ummayads, even with Tibetan allies, could have a force of 250,000 in a region so far from their centre of power. 180.150.38.34 ( talk) 09:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)