![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Battle of Šibenik has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 16, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Battle of Šibenik appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 September 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The scope of this article is rather narrow, and it looks like a fork of Operation Coast-91, but one that doesn't expand sufficiently on it so as to satisfy the requirements for standalone articles. There seems to be some standalone coverage of the events at Šibenik, but not much, and one source explicitly equates the titles: Obala "91" - Ova akcija Jugovojske je poznata i kao bitka za Šibenik odnosno "Rujanski rat".. So right now I don't see why this couldn't be a redirect to the Šibenik section of the more general article. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
This source also illustrates how the military operations in the area at the time were hardly limited to the six-day assault on Šibenik itself, but that it was all part of the larger scheme. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ErrantX ( talk · contribs) 15:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Happy to look at this, as before AGF on citations etc.
More later, I have to head out now :) -- Errant ( chat!) 15:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Other than that, I think my review is finished. Please check my copyedits. -- Errant ( chat!) 10:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I have requested clarification for the following sentence: "On 26 August, the JNA 9th (Knin) Corps openly sided with the SAO Krajina forces in the attacked the village of Kijevo." Should "in the attacked the village of Kijevo" be changed to "in the attack on the village of Kijevo"? Folklore1 ( talk) 16:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Battle of Šibenik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Battle of Šibenik has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 16, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Battle of Šibenik appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 30 September 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The scope of this article is rather narrow, and it looks like a fork of Operation Coast-91, but one that doesn't expand sufficiently on it so as to satisfy the requirements for standalone articles. There seems to be some standalone coverage of the events at Šibenik, but not much, and one source explicitly equates the titles: Obala "91" - Ova akcija Jugovojske je poznata i kao bitka za Šibenik odnosno "Rujanski rat".. So right now I don't see why this couldn't be a redirect to the Šibenik section of the more general article. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
This source also illustrates how the military operations in the area at the time were hardly limited to the six-day assault on Šibenik itself, but that it was all part of the larger scheme. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 10:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: ErrantX ( talk · contribs) 15:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Happy to look at this, as before AGF on citations etc.
More later, I have to head out now :) -- Errant ( chat!) 15:17, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Other than that, I think my review is finished. Please check my copyedits. -- Errant ( chat!) 10:45, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
I have requested clarification for the following sentence: "On 26 August, the JNA 9th (Knin) Corps openly sided with the SAO Krajina forces in the attacked the village of Kijevo." Should "in the attacked the village of Kijevo" be changed to "in the attack on the village of Kijevo"? Folklore1 ( talk) 16:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Battle of Šibenik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:53, 16 July 2017 (UTC)