This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Barngarla language is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
You've been here long enough to know that
WP:POINTY edits are inappropriate, and only reduce your credibility. —
kwami (
talk) 19:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply
LOLOL you were the one who put "silliness" as an edit comment; your credibility is the one on the ropes, boyo, and rightly so.
Skookum1 (
talk) 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The edit wasn't pointy. I was trying to find an arrangement that would work with both your preferences and the guidelines. --
JHunterJ (
talk) 16:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Your edit summary was: apparently "language" is part of the name of the language. It's hard to take a sarcastic comment such as that as anything other than pointy.
Your recent move BTW was good. I was blocked from moving it, and didn't think it worth making a request for a minor spelling variant. —
kwami (
talk) 21:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Makes ya think there should be a guideline about
WP:SILLINESS huh? The same matter applies in the meanings of people-names (as was affirmed in the endonym RMs of last year and this re
St'at'imc and
Secwepemc, etc); this was all taken into account in the "old consensus", which is actually the "new" consensus, the former having been ignored, the latter stonewalled and denied and confounded endlessly. By silliness. And isn't that edit comment, one like so many, an NPA?
Skookum1 (
talk) 12:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Barngarla language is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
You've been here long enough to know that
WP:POINTY edits are inappropriate, and only reduce your credibility. —
kwami (
talk) 19:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply
LOLOL you were the one who put "silliness" as an edit comment; your credibility is the one on the ropes, boyo, and rightly so.
Skookum1 (
talk) 19:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply
The edit wasn't pointy. I was trying to find an arrangement that would work with both your preferences and the guidelines. --
JHunterJ (
talk) 16:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Your edit summary was: apparently "language" is part of the name of the language. It's hard to take a sarcastic comment such as that as anything other than pointy.
Your recent move BTW was good. I was blocked from moving it, and didn't think it worth making a request for a minor spelling variant. —
kwami (
talk) 21:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)reply
Makes ya think there should be a guideline about
WP:SILLINESS huh? The same matter applies in the meanings of people-names (as was affirmed in the endonym RMs of last year and this re
St'at'imc and
Secwepemc, etc); this was all taken into account in the "old consensus", which is actually the "new" consensus, the former having been ignored, the latter stonewalled and denied and confounded endlessly. By silliness. And isn't that edit comment, one like so many, an NPA?
Skookum1 (
talk) 12:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)reply