![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Teenage activism is an important aspect of history, and the people involved should be remembered."
While I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment, doesn't this violate the NPOV policies of Wikipedia by stating an opinion as fact? 71.215.129.154 16:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
This article - should anyone take the time to review it - is an excellent example of BOT generated references that because of their very limited capability in logic, do not check for conflicts. All of the reference problems in this article (and there were 4 or 5 to start with) were created by robot software that was used to add references to an article. In the various instances, it seems that the BOT was unable to see (detect) the earlier work of another BOT, and its reference definitions that were already used. It is a fairly frequent problem throughout Wikipedia and for that reason alone should be looked into by a technocrat... Regards... Stevenmitchell ( talk) 16:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Barbara Rose Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Teenage activism is an important aspect of history, and the people involved should be remembered."
While I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment, doesn't this violate the NPOV policies of Wikipedia by stating an opinion as fact? 71.215.129.154 16:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
This article - should anyone take the time to review it - is an excellent example of BOT generated references that because of their very limited capability in logic, do not check for conflicts. All of the reference problems in this article (and there were 4 or 5 to start with) were created by robot software that was used to add references to an article. In the various instances, it seems that the BOT was unable to see (detect) the earlier work of another BOT, and its reference definitions that were already used. It is a fairly frequent problem throughout Wikipedia and for that reason alone should be looked into by a technocrat... Regards... Stevenmitchell ( talk) 16:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Barbara Rose Johns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)