List of electoral constituencies of Barabanki district was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 January 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Barabanki district. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Barabanki district article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bahut is a famous village in Haidergarh Barabanki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.28.32 ( talk) 14:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Barabanki district's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ReferenceB":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:22, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
My counter argymnts are;
-- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 13:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I find it really intresting that there are few people who show their intrest while an article or section needs expansion but as soon as as it is expanded suddenly many people start showing intrest in trimming down the thing. It seems really easy to delete work by other even if it is sourced and referenced upon one pretext or another. Encyclopedia is just not about intrest its about knowledge and that to overall knowledge. You can overlook small piece if it doen't matches your intrest. If we go by intrest logic then nothing will remain on any article in detail becuse somebody will be there who will find it of non-intrest. BTW there are not many editors on this article but even they had not find it trivial enough to delete it.
Now coming to
WP:RS & history books of GOI, imo Report of the regular settlement of the Bara Banki district By Francis Edward A. Chamier, Settlement Officer, Bara Banki, 18th January, 1871 the reference used for table under question is a reliable, published sources. And who said that one has to find a history book published by the GoI only.
The table in question depicts admin data at crucial time of district when district was undergoin reorganization under British in 1870s.
--
Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider
t
c
s
08:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Why should I need a source to remove a piece of information whose relevance is not established? Do you have any Current RS regarding place's history then come with it and then modify the article. And are you under the impression that I need an invitation / permission from you to modify this article? If so, say so explicitly. Otherwise, stop trying to make such preposterous insinuations. And since you apparantly are unable to establish the relevance / importance of this antiquated piece of information, please stop trying to insert it into the article.- Civilizededucation talk 16:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
This GoI website can be a current RS to write the history of Barabanki and other things can also be sourced from here. I found some other travel agents giving a history of Barabanki, but I would not see them as too strong an RS because they are sites seeking to promote the place due to a commercial interest.- Civilizededucation talk 08:16, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
I see that there are some external links in the body of the article, linking to some commercial sites. These are against WP:CITE. They should not be in the body of the article. Secondly, too much description is being given about particular companies like their ISO certificates, addresses, etc. This is semi promotional stuff. It should also not be in the article?- Civilizededucation talk 10:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa ( talk) 00:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://bhagirathi.iitr.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/123456789/583/1/2.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.zpdicarkanpur.org.in/downloads/farmerst-list%28Zone-IV%29-2.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nimsme.org/pdf/News_March09.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://arvindkumarsinghgope.com/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:33, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
I think the content inside is longer than how much it should be. I don't think the subject is so much notable. Lightbluerain❄ ( Talk | contribs) 17:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low."
List of electoral constituencies of Barabanki district was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 January 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Barabanki district. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Barabanki district article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bahut is a famous village in Haidergarh Barabanki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.28.32 ( talk) 14:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Barabanki district's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "ReferenceB":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:22, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
My counter argymnts are;
-- Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider t c s 13:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I find it really intresting that there are few people who show their intrest while an article or section needs expansion but as soon as as it is expanded suddenly many people start showing intrest in trimming down the thing. It seems really easy to delete work by other even if it is sourced and referenced upon one pretext or another. Encyclopedia is just not about intrest its about knowledge and that to overall knowledge. You can overlook small piece if it doen't matches your intrest. If we go by intrest logic then nothing will remain on any article in detail becuse somebody will be there who will find it of non-intrest. BTW there are not many editors on this article but even they had not find it trivial enough to delete it.
Now coming to
WP:RS & history books of GOI, imo Report of the regular settlement of the Bara Banki district By Francis Edward A. Chamier, Settlement Officer, Bara Banki, 18th January, 1871 the reference used for table under question is a reliable, published sources. And who said that one has to find a history book published by the GoI only.
The table in question depicts admin data at crucial time of district when district was undergoin reorganization under British in 1870s.
--
Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider
t
c
s
08:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Why should I need a source to remove a piece of information whose relevance is not established? Do you have any Current RS regarding place's history then come with it and then modify the article. And are you under the impression that I need an invitation / permission from you to modify this article? If so, say so explicitly. Otherwise, stop trying to make such preposterous insinuations. And since you apparantly are unable to establish the relevance / importance of this antiquated piece of information, please stop trying to insert it into the article.- Civilizededucation talk 16:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
This GoI website can be a current RS to write the history of Barabanki and other things can also be sourced from here. I found some other travel agents giving a history of Barabanki, but I would not see them as too strong an RS because they are sites seeking to promote the place due to a commercial interest.- Civilizededucation talk 08:16, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
I see that there are some external links in the body of the article, linking to some commercial sites. These are against WP:CITE. They should not be in the body of the article. Secondly, too much description is being given about particular companies like their ISO certificates, addresses, etc. This is semi promotional stuff. It should also not be in the article?- Civilizededucation talk 10:54, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa ( talk) 00:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://bhagirathi.iitr.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/123456789/583/1/2.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.zpdicarkanpur.org.in/downloads/farmerst-list%28Zone-IV%29-2.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nimsme.org/pdf/News_March09.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://arvindkumarsinghgope.com/When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:56, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:33, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Barabanki district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
I think the content inside is longer than how much it should be. I don't think the subject is so much notable. Lightbluerain❄ ( Talk | contribs) 17:29, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
"Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low."