This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
Bangladeshi cricket team in Australia in 2003 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This will be my first review but it was suggested that people jump in to clear the backlog. I'll try my hardest not to make any new guy mistakes.
Cptnono (
talk)
08:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
cricinfo (ESPN subsidiary) looks completely reliable. One source needs text and formatting is not consistent but that is easily fixed during the full review.
If the cheatsheet found
here is correct some of the quotes need inline citations within the sentence. I noticed throughout the Second Test section.
In the Second Test section the commas may need to be tinkered with. "played much better than expected," and was a "much faster pitch than that in Darwin," See
WP:LQ (Period after Darwin)
Cptnono (
talk)
09:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
According to
WP:CITE#HOW web pages require authors. I was also under the impression that this was a GA requirement but it actually isn't mentioned at GA Criteria. I wouldn't feel right not passing this article because of this. Unless you are against adding the authors based on style, I would be happy to throw them in myself.
Cptnono (
talk)
11:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
DoneThis is a really annoying and trivial change. It looks like the "who" makes this a nominal group instead of a sentence. This is mentioned specifically in the caption MOS. So the period or the who need to go. I think removing , who would look better.
Cptnono (
talk)
11:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
DoneCaptions, per
MOS:IMAGES information is to be in the text not the captions. The text in the captions gives some good info but might be better as "this is so and so batting" I have seen much worse so maybe the level used is acceptable.
DoneDamien Martyn's image is left aligned under a third level heading. Per MOS mentioned above "Do not place left-aligned images directly below a subsection-level heading (=== or lower), as this sometimes disconnects the heading from the text that follows it. This can often be avoided by shifting left-aligned images down a paragraph or two."
Cptnono (
talk)
23:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Numbers
I am completely neutral on this and am only suggesting it as an alternative. Would it be better to use the players numbers in the squad table instead of in the prose?
Cptnono (
talk)
00:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Those changes actually made a positive and substantial difference in the way it reads. This might come across weird but I believe "Their performance" (dropping the "s") is more inline with common grammar since "their" takes the place of "the team's". Could be US English only or even incorrect, though. Any thoughts?
Cptnono (
talk)
10:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Nice work Aaroncrick. You have made this article look clean and have added some great information. You have made related articles look under par in comparison (with no offense to other editors intended). I'm sure any minor tweaks or adjustments will only improve it further so I will be passing this article.
Cptnono (
talk)
12:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
Bangladeshi cricket team in Australia in 2003. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of
cricket. Please participate by visiting the
project and
talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based
WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in
one big list and in
CSV format)
Bangladeshi cricket team in Australia in 2003 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles
This will be my first review but it was suggested that people jump in to clear the backlog. I'll try my hardest not to make any new guy mistakes.
Cptnono (
talk)
08:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
cricinfo (ESPN subsidiary) looks completely reliable. One source needs text and formatting is not consistent but that is easily fixed during the full review.
If the cheatsheet found
here is correct some of the quotes need inline citations within the sentence. I noticed throughout the Second Test section.
In the Second Test section the commas may need to be tinkered with. "played much better than expected," and was a "much faster pitch than that in Darwin," See
WP:LQ (Period after Darwin)
Cptnono (
talk)
09:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
According to
WP:CITE#HOW web pages require authors. I was also under the impression that this was a GA requirement but it actually isn't mentioned at GA Criteria. I wouldn't feel right not passing this article because of this. Unless you are against adding the authors based on style, I would be happy to throw them in myself.
Cptnono (
talk)
11:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
DoneThis is a really annoying and trivial change. It looks like the "who" makes this a nominal group instead of a sentence. This is mentioned specifically in the caption MOS. So the period or the who need to go. I think removing , who would look better.
Cptnono (
talk)
11:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
DoneCaptions, per
MOS:IMAGES information is to be in the text not the captions. The text in the captions gives some good info but might be better as "this is so and so batting" I have seen much worse so maybe the level used is acceptable.
DoneDamien Martyn's image is left aligned under a third level heading. Per MOS mentioned above "Do not place left-aligned images directly below a subsection-level heading (=== or lower), as this sometimes disconnects the heading from the text that follows it. This can often be avoided by shifting left-aligned images down a paragraph or two."
Cptnono (
talk)
23:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Numbers
I am completely neutral on this and am only suggesting it as an alternative. Would it be better to use the players numbers in the squad table instead of in the prose?
Cptnono (
talk)
00:04, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Those changes actually made a positive and substantial difference in the way it reads. This might come across weird but I believe "Their performance" (dropping the "s") is more inline with common grammar since "their" takes the place of "the team's". Could be US English only or even incorrect, though. Any thoughts?
Cptnono (
talk)
10:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Nice work Aaroncrick. You have made this article look clean and have added some great information. You have made related articles look under par in comparison (with no offense to other editors intended). I'm sure any minor tweaks or adjustments will only improve it further so I will be passing this article.
Cptnono (
talk)
12:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)reply
I have just modified 2 external links on
Bangladeshi cricket team in Australia in 2003. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.