![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I work for Balyasny Asset Management. I've updated the AUM in the main article to reflect the latest number, but want to bring some ideas to the table to tighten the current insider trading topic. I see that the timeline and investigations may be a bit confusing in the current form, and wanted to propose the following to clarify the events based on the existing sources, and to expand on them with an additional one as well.
The 2010 investigation yielded no outcome, but there aren’t any news sources that address this.
References
I'd be interested in hearing the community's thoughts on these points and am pinging Imcdc who created the original article and may be interested in weighing in. Thank you, Dorset Wilts ( talk) 13:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
"The firm sent a letter to investors reassuring them that no improper activity had been discovered."and the description of the beginning of an investigation whose end no one apparently reported on. If nothing else, Chicago's court website ought to have information on the outcome of this investigation seeing as how it took place there. (U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara lead the probe.) If that's all there is, then I don't see why it couldn't be added to the article to at least give that paragraph some sense of closure (but not the company-issued pronouncements). IMHO a search of publicly-available court documents should get underway to see what can be found. Regards, Spintendo 22:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have taken over for my colleague Dorset Wilts. The following are suggestions for updating the Background section of the article:
References
I have also updated the AUM in the article. Pinging Encoded since you assisted with the previous edit request. Thank you, Popcorn388 ( talk) 09:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Hi, I work for Balyasny Asset Management. I've updated the AUM in the main article to reflect the latest number, but want to bring some ideas to the table to tighten the current insider trading topic. I see that the timeline and investigations may be a bit confusing in the current form, and wanted to propose the following to clarify the events based on the existing sources, and to expand on them with an additional one as well.
The 2010 investigation yielded no outcome, but there aren’t any news sources that address this.
References
I'd be interested in hearing the community's thoughts on these points and am pinging Imcdc who created the original article and may be interested in weighing in. Thank you, Dorset Wilts ( talk) 13:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
"The firm sent a letter to investors reassuring them that no improper activity had been discovered."and the description of the beginning of an investigation whose end no one apparently reported on. If nothing else, Chicago's court website ought to have information on the outcome of this investigation seeing as how it took place there. (U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara lead the probe.) If that's all there is, then I don't see why it couldn't be added to the article to at least give that paragraph some sense of closure (but not the company-issued pronouncements). IMHO a search of publicly-available court documents should get underway to see what can be found. Regards, Spintendo 22:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have taken over for my colleague Dorset Wilts. The following are suggestions for updating the Background section of the article:
References
I have also updated the AUM in the article. Pinging Encoded since you assisted with the previous edit request. Thank you, Popcorn388 ( talk) 09:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)