![]() | Baldwin Street was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 15, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Baldwin Street article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 31 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
There is a very much steeper hill in the Andalucian village Alcalá de los Gazules and the street is called Calle Nuestra Señora de los Santos. In fact, in the town there are several streets much steeper than this. Sounds like this is a non-article. Alcalainonuevo 14:37, 15 January 2010 (GMT)
Apart from obvious referencing shortcomings, the article lead is too short. There is little on early history. Some digging in PapersPast may reveal valuable information. Is the classic Dunedin history City of Dunedin silent on Baldwin Street? Schwede 66 08:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Electricmaster ( talk · contribs) 07:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 ( talk · contribs) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this article is too far from meeting the GA criteria to address in a normal review period. In particular, there is an accurate {{
refimprove}} banner (see
WP:QF #3), as well as [citation needed] tags and unsourced statements in other sections. The article thus fails criterion 2c. There are several additional issues that would also need to be addressed to meet the GA criteria:
Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Baldwin Street was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 15, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Baldwin Street article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 31 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
There is a very much steeper hill in the Andalucian village Alcalá de los Gazules and the street is called Calle Nuestra Señora de los Santos. In fact, in the town there are several streets much steeper than this. Sounds like this is a non-article. Alcalainonuevo 14:37, 15 January 2010 (GMT)
Apart from obvious referencing shortcomings, the article lead is too short. There is little on early history. Some digging in PapersPast may reveal valuable information. Is the classic Dunedin history City of Dunedin silent on Baldwin Street? Schwede 66 08:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Electricmaster ( talk · contribs) 07:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pi.1415926535 ( talk · contribs) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this article is too far from meeting the GA criteria to address in a normal review period. In particular, there is an accurate {{
refimprove}} banner (see
WP:QF #3), as well as [citation needed] tags and unsourced statements in other sections. The article thus fails criterion 2c. There are several additional issues that would also need to be addressed to meet the GA criteria:
Pi.1415926535 ( talk) 19:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)