![]() | A fact from Bahsahwahbee appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Lightburst (
talk) 14:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by Reywas92 ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bahsahwahbee; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
@
Reywas92: Good article. Waiting on QPQ. Though, it does feel like the article is nearing on
WP:CLOP with the NRHP source so maybe some copyediting would do some good.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 02:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
It's not acceptable to put your own commentary in this article or the Johnston article. "It is unlikely he would target a large tribe of Indians based on this report." is WP:Original research that is your own interpretation of WP:PRIMARY sources, not a conclusion made by a reliable independent source. The article should only include sources relevant to this place and event. If you can find a source that discusses the historicity of Wilson's account that would be great! But do NOT make your own conclusions with sources that do not mention this place at all. Reywas92 Talk 01:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
The dispute between @ DeoVindice and @ Reywas92 seems to have reignited.
The dispute was discussed here Talk:Bahsahwahbee#"Counterpoints" without resolution.
The dispute was brought up at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard here Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 238#Bahsahwahbee but was closed as "apparently abandoned".
These editors should discuss further to reach a compromise or follow one of the dispute resolution options as outlined here [1]
IOHANNVSVERVS ( talk) 01:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Bahsahwahbee appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by
Lightburst (
talk) 14:35, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by Reywas92 ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:48, 6 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bahsahwahbee; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall:
@
Reywas92: Good article. Waiting on QPQ. Though, it does feel like the article is nearing on
WP:CLOP with the NRHP source so maybe some copyediting would do some good.
Onegreatjoke (
talk) 02:50, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
It's not acceptable to put your own commentary in this article or the Johnston article. "It is unlikely he would target a large tribe of Indians based on this report." is WP:Original research that is your own interpretation of WP:PRIMARY sources, not a conclusion made by a reliable independent source. The article should only include sources relevant to this place and event. If you can find a source that discusses the historicity of Wilson's account that would be great! But do NOT make your own conclusions with sources that do not mention this place at all. Reywas92 Talk 01:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
The dispute between @ DeoVindice and @ Reywas92 seems to have reignited.
The dispute was discussed here Talk:Bahsahwahbee#"Counterpoints" without resolution.
The dispute was brought up at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard here Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 238#Bahsahwahbee but was closed as "apparently abandoned".
These editors should discuss further to reach a compromise or follow one of the dispute resolution options as outlined here [1]
IOHANNVSVERVS ( talk) 01:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)