![]() | Bahrain Thirteen has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " In the news" column on September 5, 2012. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are they deep concerned. Bahrain is sovereign country and has power to trial anybody just like we don't comment on United States judiciary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.136.205.176 ( talk) 14:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: North8000 ( talk · contribs) 16:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
I am starting a review of this article. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 16:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Upon my first look, it appears that the last sentence of the lead is misleading. As written it appears to be about the court cases but in fact it was about their treatment in prison. If I'm right, can you clarify or separate? North8000 ( talk) 16:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm trying to assess how this article is with respect to coverage/balance within its proper scope. So the next question is "what is its proper scope"? To some extent this is an article defined by a term rather than a subject with a scope that would still be definable (the same way) if that term did not exist. Surely it's not an article on what the title literally refers to; if it were, ther article woulg be 13 full biographies. There is no single "right" answer but I would think that the minimum scope would be there "13's" role in the uprising / actions leading to their arrests, and then related events which followed. Plus at least enough context information to allow absorption of the material as it is read, and that "context" material is also closely related.
One thought after a couple of reads is that 90% of th4e article seems to consist just of "what the government did to them" and "what other said about what the government did to them". I would think that ~75% would be fine but that 90% leaves out other useful content. So IMHO what it needs is about a 10% or 15% expansion in those other areas. Some suggestions (if material is available):
What do you think? North8000 ( talk) 22:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that "A retrial in a civilian court was held in April 2012 but the accused were not released from prison." or something like it is in both the lead and the body. This is a confusing sentence; it appears to discuss "prison status" instead of the results of the court hearing...could you clarify? North8000 ( talk) 13:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Is there any material available on Bahraini public view/opinion of these individuals? North8000 ( talk) 13:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The article seems to be in American English, but in a few places British English spelling are used. I can fix those if American English is intended, but first need I to know: do you intend that thes be in American or British English? North8000 ( talk) 13:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that there is only about a 1/2 of a sentence in the article about any support of Bahraini people for the crackdown actions. Is this because such support or coverage of such is non-existent? I know that in another article that we worked on together it was (going from memory....I probably have this wrong ) it was added that such support was due to fear that such activists might cause transition to an Islamist or Shia state. Is this applicable here? More generally speaking, is this absence of coverage of such in the article due to such support being non-existent or not covered in sources? Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 03:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Well-written
Factually accurate and verifiable
Broad in its coverage
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
Illustrated, if possible, by images
This article passes as a Good Article. Congratulations on an excellent article! I will implement the details shortly. North8000 (
talk)
17:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations! This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. I am "duplicating" this here for when the review is no longer transcluded. Nice work! Sincerely North8000 ( talk) 17:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Reviewer
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Bahrain Thirteen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Bahrain Thirteen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE11/020/2011/en/cec899ed-d573-49e8-93d5-86a1fee362fe/mde110202011en.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE11/026/2011/en/678732eb-e693-42d0-b2db-8c2102191184/mde110262011en.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.bahrainmirror.com/article.php?id=5725&cid=73When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Bahrain Thirteen has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " In the news" column on September 5, 2012. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why are they deep concerned. Bahrain is sovereign country and has power to trial anybody just like we don't comment on United States judiciary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.136.205.176 ( talk) 14:08, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: North8000 ( talk · contribs) 16:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
I am starting a review of this article. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 16:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Upon my first look, it appears that the last sentence of the lead is misleading. As written it appears to be about the court cases but in fact it was about their treatment in prison. If I'm right, can you clarify or separate? North8000 ( talk) 16:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm trying to assess how this article is with respect to coverage/balance within its proper scope. So the next question is "what is its proper scope"? To some extent this is an article defined by a term rather than a subject with a scope that would still be definable (the same way) if that term did not exist. Surely it's not an article on what the title literally refers to; if it were, ther article woulg be 13 full biographies. There is no single "right" answer but I would think that the minimum scope would be there "13's" role in the uprising / actions leading to their arrests, and then related events which followed. Plus at least enough context information to allow absorption of the material as it is read, and that "context" material is also closely related.
One thought after a couple of reads is that 90% of th4e article seems to consist just of "what the government did to them" and "what other said about what the government did to them". I would think that ~75% would be fine but that 90% leaves out other useful content. So IMHO what it needs is about a 10% or 15% expansion in those other areas. Some suggestions (if material is available):
What do you think? North8000 ( talk) 22:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that "A retrial in a civilian court was held in April 2012 but the accused were not released from prison." or something like it is in both the lead and the body. This is a confusing sentence; it appears to discuss "prison status" instead of the results of the court hearing...could you clarify? North8000 ( talk) 13:10, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Is there any material available on Bahraini public view/opinion of these individuals? North8000 ( talk) 13:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
The article seems to be in American English, but in a few places British English spelling are used. I can fix those if American English is intended, but first need I to know: do you intend that thes be in American or British English? North8000 ( talk) 13:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that there is only about a 1/2 of a sentence in the article about any support of Bahraini people for the crackdown actions. Is this because such support or coverage of such is non-existent? I know that in another article that we worked on together it was (going from memory....I probably have this wrong ) it was added that such support was due to fear that such activists might cause transition to an Islamist or Shia state. Is this applicable here? More generally speaking, is this absence of coverage of such in the article due to such support being non-existent or not covered in sources? Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 03:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Well-written
Factually accurate and verifiable
Broad in its coverage
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
Illustrated, if possible, by images
This article passes as a Good Article. Congratulations on an excellent article! I will implement the details shortly. North8000 (
talk)
17:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations! This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. I am "duplicating" this here for when the review is no longer transcluded. Nice work! Sincerely North8000 ( talk) 17:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Reviewer
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Bahrain Thirteen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Bahrain Thirteen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE11/020/2011/en/cec899ed-d573-49e8-93d5-86a1fee362fe/mde110202011en.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE11/026/2011/en/678732eb-e693-42d0-b2db-8c2102191184/mde110262011en.pdf{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.bahrainmirror.com/article.php?id=5725&cid=73When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:14, 13 July 2017 (UTC)