From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

removed footnote

I've removed the following citation which was added to the first sentence:

  • Rhenanus, Beatus. Rerum Germanicarum libri III. p. 748.

It seems an interesting work. A direct link to the page is here: https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11097280?page=786 . However I don't believe it is an RS, and nor does it add any particularly notable information as far as I can see.-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 13:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

removed footnote

I've removed the following citation which was added to the first sentence:

  • Rhenanus, Beatus. Rerum Germanicarum libri III. p. 748.

It seems an interesting work. A direct link to the page is here: https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb11097280?page=786 . However I don't believe it is an RS, and nor does it add any particularly notable information as far as I can see.-- Andrew Lancaster ( talk) 13:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook