This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bad Rats article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Bad Rats" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Bad Rats has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 13, 2021. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Considered low importance This does not make sense as it should be high importance 173.21.19.27 ( talk) 08:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes it does 173.21.19.27 ( talk) 01:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I was a victim of receiving this game. ♦
jaguar
22:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I can't justify putting this on hold so I'll promote this outright. It meets the GA criteria through its comprehensibility and is generally well-written. The above are very minor, and I know it would be difficult to expand this further. ♦ jaguar 00:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
03:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by IceWelder ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A short, but well written GA article on a video game, making it eligible for a DYK. The hook I found to be good enough, if a little terse. I know shorter is better for DYK entires, but perhaps adding a bit of context to why it was a gag gift would make it easier to understand. Possibly:
I have proposed that this game be added as an entry at List of video games notable for negative reception. Please consider contributing to the the discussion there. 93 ( talk) 03:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bad Rats article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Bad Rats" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Bad Rats has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 13, 2021. | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Considered low importance This does not make sense as it should be high importance 173.21.19.27 ( talk) 08:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Yes it does 173.21.19.27 ( talk) 01:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 22:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I was a victim of receiving this game. ♦
jaguar
22:54, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
I can't justify putting this on hold so I'll promote this outright. It meets the GA criteria through its comprehensibility and is generally well-written. The above are very minor, and I know it would be difficult to expand this further. ♦ jaguar 00:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
SL93 (
talk)
03:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by IceWelder ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: A short, but well written GA article on a video game, making it eligible for a DYK. The hook I found to be good enough, if a little terse. I know shorter is better for DYK entires, but perhaps adding a bit of context to why it was a gag gift would make it easier to understand. Possibly:
I have proposed that this game be added as an entry at List of video games notable for negative reception. Please consider contributing to the the discussion there. 93 ( talk) 03:31, 1 June 2022 (UTC)