This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Background section, this sentence ---> "The Rock would finally accepted" and " needs to be fixed. Same section, this ---> "On the final episode of Raw before Backlash", this ---> "On the final episode of SmackDown! before Backlash", this ---> "The feud intensified on the final episode of Raw before Backlash", and this ---> "The feud escalated the following week on the final episode of SmackDown! before Backlash", seem a bit off, it should probably say something during the week of Backlash or something, but not the final episode. In the Event, I know who "
Long" is, but how 'bout the person that reads this article. In the Aftermath, "After Backlash" is mentioned twice, it would be best if it were mentioned once.
In the lead, it would be best if "Chris Jericho" were linked once, per
here. In the Background section, "March 31, 2003" and "April 17, 2003" are linked twice. In the Aftermath, "April 28, 2003" is linked twice.
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
Thank you to Matt for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
In the Background section, this sentence ---> "The Rock would finally accepted" and " needs to be fixed. Same section, this ---> "On the final episode of Raw before Backlash", this ---> "On the final episode of SmackDown! before Backlash", this ---> "The feud intensified on the final episode of Raw before Backlash", and this ---> "The feud escalated the following week on the final episode of SmackDown! before Backlash", seem a bit off, it should probably say something during the week of Backlash or something, but not the final episode. In the Event, I know who "
Long" is, but how 'bout the person that reads this article. In the Aftermath, "After Backlash" is mentioned twice, it would be best if it were mentioned once.
In the lead, it would be best if "Chris Jericho" were linked once, per
here. In the Background section, "March 31, 2003" and "April 17, 2003" are linked twice. In the Aftermath, "April 28, 2003" is linked twice.
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline:
B.
Reliable sources are
cited inline. All content that
could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
Thank you to Matt for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (HitBLUE) 00:03, 19 July 2008 (UTC)reply