This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
Back to Base X is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
@
Krächz: There are several statements made in this article, such as the genre, studios where the album was recorded, and especially "The album was well received," in the lead, etc., that need references to external sources to know they're accurate. Plus external sources to get more info, like a more-specific release date, would also be great to have here.
QuietHere (
talk)
15:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Okay, I doubled, tripled and quatrupled the sources, so every single sentence has a reference now. The lead normally is a conclusion of the following article and needs no further verification. Are the two reviews I used in "style" and "reception" not a "well" recievement? Otherwise I have to delete the sentence from the lead, that is no big deal. If you want further information, feel free to add. A template for verification is not the right tool to expand an article, I guess. --
Krächz (
talk)
16:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)reply
My English isn't that good to joint the discussion, but definitely
WP:Synth is relevant for our question, so no more contradiction. en-Wiki seems to be stricter in this topic than de-Wiki. --
Krächz (
talk)
22:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
Back to Base X is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
Australia and
Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
@
Krächz: There are several statements made in this article, such as the genre, studios where the album was recorded, and especially "The album was well received," in the lead, etc., that need references to external sources to know they're accurate. Plus external sources to get more info, like a more-specific release date, would also be great to have here.
QuietHere (
talk)
15:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)reply
Okay, I doubled, tripled and quatrupled the sources, so every single sentence has a reference now. The lead normally is a conclusion of the following article and needs no further verification. Are the two reviews I used in "style" and "reception" not a "well" recievement? Otherwise I have to delete the sentence from the lead, that is no big deal. If you want further information, feel free to add. A template for verification is not the right tool to expand an article, I guess. --
Krächz (
talk)
16:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)reply
My English isn't that good to joint the discussion, but definitely
WP:Synth is relevant for our question, so no more contradiction. en-Wiki seems to be stricter in this topic than de-Wiki. --
Krächz (
talk)
22:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)reply