![]() | Back in the High Life has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 30, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Back in the High Life appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Image:Back in the High Life.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Back in the High Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk)
20:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Binksternet ( talk) and Isento ( talk). Nominated by Binksternet ( talk) at 17:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ritchie333 ( talk · contribs) 21:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
As promised, I'll review this. I can't think of any reasons to quickfail, everything looks reasonably sourced and images / media are covered by the respective licenses. I was surprised to see only one citation to While You See A Chance: The Steve Winwood Story / John Van der Kiste, but perhaps the book only covers a couple of pages to document this album.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
21:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Is Steve Winwood really a "rock" singer? With Blind Faith, unquestionably, with Traffic, probably, with " Valerie", definitely not.
Why is Winwood's personal life important to mention in the lead? If it influenced the music (cf. Face Value), then that should be mentioned, otherwise it seems a bit to WP:BLPGOSSIPy to state up front. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
There are a couple of issues, but none are major and most are easily addressable. I'll put the review on hold pending improvements. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Okay, I would suggest the following :
![]() | Back in the High Life has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 30, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Back in the High Life appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 7 August 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Image:Back in the High Life.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 04:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Back in the High Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
The Squirrel Conspiracy (
talk)
20:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
5x expanded by Binksternet ( talk) and Isento ( talk). Nominated by Binksternet ( talk) at 17:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ritchie333 ( talk · contribs) 21:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
As promised, I'll review this. I can't think of any reasons to quickfail, everything looks reasonably sourced and images / media are covered by the respective licenses. I was surprised to see only one citation to While You See A Chance: The Steve Winwood Story / John Van der Kiste, but perhaps the book only covers a couple of pages to document this album.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
21:46, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Is Steve Winwood really a "rock" singer? With Blind Faith, unquestionably, with Traffic, probably, with " Valerie", definitely not.
Why is Winwood's personal life important to mention in the lead? If it influenced the music (cf. Face Value), then that should be mentioned, otherwise it seems a bit to WP:BLPGOSSIPy to state up front. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
There are a couple of issues, but none are major and most are easily addressable. I'll put the review on hold pending improvements. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Okay, I would suggest the following :