![]() | A fact from Ba Zaw appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 November 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Excellent work on this article—great writing. I have a few questions/thoughts (mostly stemming from my unfamiliarity with Burmese art). No rush.
Again, this work is really impressive. I'm glad I had a chance to read it, and hopefully my comments will be of future use. czar · · 05:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know the Burmese spelling of his name? Angr ( talk) 18:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
It will take me some time to respond to all of the points above and my schedule just got jammed. But I looked over the revised article quickly. I don't think there are any problems with the "citation needed" sections.
I will answer quickly here on one point and get to the others later.
Some other points are more complicated and will take more time to answer. I will fix the citation problems. Thanks for your kind words on the quality of the work and attetnion to the piece! Hsaya ( talk) 02:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | A fact from Ba Zaw appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 November 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Excellent work on this article—great writing. I have a few questions/thoughts (mostly stemming from my unfamiliarity with Burmese art). No rush.
Again, this work is really impressive. I'm glad I had a chance to read it, and hopefully my comments will be of future use. czar · · 05:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know the Burmese spelling of his name? Angr ( talk) 18:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
It will take me some time to respond to all of the points above and my schedule just got jammed. But I looked over the revised article quickly. I don't think there are any problems with the "citation needed" sections.
I will answer quickly here on one point and get to the others later.
Some other points are more complicated and will take more time to answer. I will fix the citation problems. Thanks for your kind words on the quality of the work and attetnion to the piece! Hsaya ( talk) 02:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC)