This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Logo is incorrect. It's amazing how often moderators will unduly reverse edits but not pay attention to the clear vandalism that took place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrieldawiki ( talk • contribs) 17:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
It seems the article was created specifically to add the page about controversies which single out a single controversy and a single person (it is inaccurate since the individual was not involved or implicated in any money laundering investigation).
The bank was involved in numerous other controversies such as 1MDB scandal together with Goldman Sachs, it was fined by US authorities like every other Swiss bank.
the compromat.ru website (which collates kompromat i.e. false blackmail material) is self-evidently not a reliable source so should not be relied upon; and it is irrelevant to name one former employee in an article about the whole bank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.219.136.74 ( talk) 11:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Logo is incorrect. It's amazing how often moderators will unduly reverse edits but not pay attention to the clear vandalism that took place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabrieldawiki ( talk • contribs) 17:30, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
It seems the article was created specifically to add the page about controversies which single out a single controversy and a single person (it is inaccurate since the individual was not involved or implicated in any money laundering investigation).
The bank was involved in numerous other controversies such as 1MDB scandal together with Goldman Sachs, it was fined by US authorities like every other Swiss bank.
the compromat.ru website (which collates kompromat i.e. false blackmail material) is self-evidently not a reliable source so should not be relied upon; and it is irrelevant to name one former employee in an article about the whole bank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.219.136.74 ( talk) 11:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)