From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Independent references

Here are a few that I found on a quick search:

I'm sure with more time I could find more... Slambo (Speak) 16:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Walford, John (2003). Taylor, R.K. (ed.). A Detailed History of British Railways Standard Steam Locomotives - Volume Two: The 4-6-0 and 2-6-0 Classes. Peterborough: RCTS. pp. 168–211. ISBN  0-901115-93-2. particularly p. 201 -- Redrose64 ( talk) 23:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Images

I do not think that anyone would disagree that what is required in the article are, the best available, most illustrative of the text, photographs. It is understandable the User: Moylesy98 prefers what they describe as "MY F*CKING IMAGES" but please User: Moylesy98 come to talk to discuss rather than edit war to include them. Meanwhile I will replace the images preferred by those other than the editor who wants their own images. SovalValtos ( talk) 05:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Independent references

Here are a few that I found on a quick search:

I'm sure with more time I could find more... Slambo (Speak) 16:51, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Walford, John (2003). Taylor, R.K. (ed.). A Detailed History of British Railways Standard Steam Locomotives - Volume Two: The 4-6-0 and 2-6-0 Classes. Peterborough: RCTS. pp. 168–211. ISBN  0-901115-93-2. particularly p. 201 -- Redrose64 ( talk) 23:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:51, 17 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Images

I do not think that anyone would disagree that what is required in the article are, the best available, most illustrative of the text, photographs. It is understandable the User: Moylesy98 prefers what they describe as "MY F*CKING IMAGES" but please User: Moylesy98 come to talk to discuss rather than edit war to include them. Meanwhile I will replace the images preferred by those other than the editor who wants their own images. SovalValtos ( talk) 05:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook