A fact from BR-319 (Brazil highway) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I replaced text brought from the Wiki in Portuguese, written mostly by the user Naldo Arruda, who lives in the Amazon region (therefore, has much more reliability to write about this BR than any user who lives outside Brazil and only reads biased information and partial by the world press), was supervised by Wiki administrators in Portuguese and the version there is considered neutral and informative enough not to be disputed by anyone.
Here, there was a compendium of a lack of information or misinformation, an abundance of bias with text written only by people interested in tackling the ecological issue, with a complete lack of relevant information elsewhere. Information is used from private eco-Shiite organizations such as Greenpeace and several others whose vision is unique and narrow, which Wikipedia does not care to propagate. Wikipedia values the neutrality of articles and they must address all fields of vision, not just the ecological. Ecological users have come here and in other articles, thinking that they own the articles they are interested in (and become violent when other users are interested in editing the article), threaten other ban users by creating purposeful editing wars, propagate misinformation, fill the article with information not relevant to the topic and delete information that is pertinent. Serious Wikipedia users ask the administration to monitor organizations that attack this and other articles en masse, even with suspicion of possible payment of wages to their members to edit Wikipedia, the largest source of information in the world, which is free to edit and has much more global reach than the blogs of their organizations. Thank you and make sure that Wikipedia does not become a mere blog of angry and blind ecologists. Rauzaruku ( talk) 16:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
A fact from BR-319 (Brazil highway) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 22 October 2016 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I replaced text brought from the Wiki in Portuguese, written mostly by the user Naldo Arruda, who lives in the Amazon region (therefore, has much more reliability to write about this BR than any user who lives outside Brazil and only reads biased information and partial by the world press), was supervised by Wiki administrators in Portuguese and the version there is considered neutral and informative enough not to be disputed by anyone.
Here, there was a compendium of a lack of information or misinformation, an abundance of bias with text written only by people interested in tackling the ecological issue, with a complete lack of relevant information elsewhere. Information is used from private eco-Shiite organizations such as Greenpeace and several others whose vision is unique and narrow, which Wikipedia does not care to propagate. Wikipedia values the neutrality of articles and they must address all fields of vision, not just the ecological. Ecological users have come here and in other articles, thinking that they own the articles they are interested in (and become violent when other users are interested in editing the article), threaten other ban users by creating purposeful editing wars, propagate misinformation, fill the article with information not relevant to the topic and delete information that is pertinent. Serious Wikipedia users ask the administration to monitor organizations that attack this and other articles en masse, even with suspicion of possible payment of wages to their members to edit Wikipedia, the largest source of information in the world, which is free to edit and has much more global reach than the blogs of their organizations. Thank you and make sure that Wikipedia does not become a mere blog of angry and blind ecologists. Rauzaruku ( talk) 16:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)