The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As Burger King is an American company, this is an American subject article. So all the dates should be American English, not British English. This goes for prose and references
Not done - The date formatting for the citations is generated by the Wiki-templates. I prefer to use that standard when I generate citations through the Wiki-template generation software. Within the body of the article I use the North American date formats for dates. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)06:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
According to Burger King marketing, → I'd remove this, it makes Burger King sound really repetitive already
are sometimes the center of product advertising for the company. → are sometimes used in the company's product advertising.
Not done - The wording choice is deliberate — I am stating that the product is sometimes at the center of advertising campaigns that is directly hawking the particular product, not simply used as part of the campaigns. The difference is important, your wording implies that they are not the main focus of advertising but simply something that is simply a component. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)06:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: I usually don't link publishers unless they are more obscure. As it is not a requirement of citations to link sources, I prefer not to clutter up the section with extraneous links. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)07:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Ref 7, 8 and 9 are self published and can't be used
Comment: According to the the MoS, these kinds of links can be used if they are used to establish verification of the existence of a subject, not for usage of information contained within them to verify facts. What I doing is using them is to verify the claim I am making that someone started these particular social media sites on that subject of bringing back chicken fries. What I am not doing is using the content of these sites as verification of a claimed statement about Chicken Fries (that would be unreliable). --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)07:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As Burger King is an American company, this is an American subject article. So all the dates should be American English, not British English. This goes for prose and references
Not done - The date formatting for the citations is generated by the Wiki-templates. I prefer to use that standard when I generate citations through the Wiki-template generation software. Within the body of the article I use the North American date formats for dates. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)06:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
According to Burger King marketing, → I'd remove this, it makes Burger King sound really repetitive already
are sometimes the center of product advertising for the company. → are sometimes used in the company's product advertising.
Not done - The wording choice is deliberate — I am stating that the product is sometimes at the center of advertising campaigns that is directly hawking the particular product, not simply used as part of the campaigns. The difference is important, your wording implies that they are not the main focus of advertising but simply something that is simply a component. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)06:26, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment: I usually don't link publishers unless they are more obscure. As it is not a requirement of citations to link sources, I prefer not to clutter up the section with extraneous links. --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)07:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Ref 7, 8 and 9 are self published and can't be used
Comment: According to the the MoS, these kinds of links can be used if they are used to establish verification of the existence of a subject, not for usage of information contained within them to verify facts. What I doing is using them is to verify the claim I am making that someone started these particular social media sites on that subject of bringing back chicken fries. What I am not doing is using the content of these sites as verification of a claimed statement about Chicken Fries (that would be unreliable). --Jeremy (
blah blah •
I did it!)07:12, 27 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.