GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 ( talk · contribs) 15:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I'll start this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 15:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I will take a further look once the above problems have been addressed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The nominator has not edited this page for a month, and there are still significant deficiencies. The lead has obvious spelling and grammar errors, and the characteristics section needs to be improved both in terms of depth and writing. However, the infobox and history section are both adequate. I am failing this nomination, but think it could be GA standard within a short period of time. AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 ( talk · contribs) 15:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
I'll start this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 15:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I will take a further look once the above problems have been addressed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 17:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
The nominator has not edited this page for a month, and there are still significant deficiencies. The lead has obvious spelling and grammar errors, and the characteristics section needs to be improved both in terms of depth and writing. However, the infobox and history section are both adequate. I am failing this nomination, but think it could be GA standard within a short period of time. AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 19:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)