This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strange, I see some kind of phobia or hysteria here. I added a decent picture showing the later version of BA-27, with details of the side of the wielded(!) hull visible. And that's when two guys come in, find a much better pic of the earlier version (bolted hull) and replace the old one with the new one instead of leaving both of them in the article. The only reason so far was stated by Irpen (
[1]) as in no way this photo illustrates the subject of the article, please don't litter unrelated articles with images of Polish suffering. Now let me explain, this picture does not feature Polish suffering, at least I don't see it there. What I see is some soldiers and the side of the BA-27, with the hatch and the periscope clearly visible. If that's irrelevant to this article then hardly any picture is. Or perhaps someone wants to argue that all pictures of Soviet or German AFV's are somehow related to Polish suffering and as such should be removed? Nonsense. I'm putting the picture back unless there is some more serious reason given.
Halibu
tt
12:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
And who is talking about hysteria? Anyway, check histories and talks, inclusing the image's own talk. Everything is there. -- Irpen 22:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
All English sources say BA-27M was created in 1931. However Russian Wikipedia BA-27 page (via google translator) goes into great details about the vehicle history, stating it appeared in 1937. Is this bogus or what? -- Kubanczyk ( talk) 16:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Creation date and when it finally arrived in the Soviet inventory are two different things. After creation, there is a developmental period when problems are found and overcome, thus the delay in issuance. Probably both years are respectively correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.13.249.246 ( talk) 16:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strange, I see some kind of phobia or hysteria here. I added a decent picture showing the later version of BA-27, with details of the side of the wielded(!) hull visible. And that's when two guys come in, find a much better pic of the earlier version (bolted hull) and replace the old one with the new one instead of leaving both of them in the article. The only reason so far was stated by Irpen (
[1]) as in no way this photo illustrates the subject of the article, please don't litter unrelated articles with images of Polish suffering. Now let me explain, this picture does not feature Polish suffering, at least I don't see it there. What I see is some soldiers and the side of the BA-27, with the hatch and the periscope clearly visible. If that's irrelevant to this article then hardly any picture is. Or perhaps someone wants to argue that all pictures of Soviet or German AFV's are somehow related to Polish suffering and as such should be removed? Nonsense. I'm putting the picture back unless there is some more serious reason given.
Halibu
tt
12:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
And who is talking about hysteria? Anyway, check histories and talks, inclusing the image's own talk. Everything is there. -- Irpen 22:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
All English sources say BA-27M was created in 1931. However Russian Wikipedia BA-27 page (via google translator) goes into great details about the vehicle history, stating it appeared in 1937. Is this bogus or what? -- Kubanczyk ( talk) 16:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Creation date and when it finally arrived in the Soviet inventory are two different things. After creation, there is a developmental period when problems are found and overcome, thus the delay in issuance. Probably both years are respectively correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.13.249.246 ( talk) 16:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)