This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MachinaExDeo. Peer reviewers: Enniks, Smp5gd, Checkerstar.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This sentence ("Probably this was one of the first societies that required education for all its members, without regard of gender or social status. ") was removed by User:129.2.183.21 without explanation. If the truth of this sentence is disputed, please state that and explain why.
Thanx.
-- Richard 06:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
OK, but why on Earth is the article tagged??? — Cesar Tort 07:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I am about to drastically rewrite this article. I think it contains several sections that are of marginal or dubious relevance to the topic. I think the article should focus on the political, social and economical organisation of the aztecs. I think topics such as architecture, art, medicine, calendar, literature and recreation belong somewhere else. For example in the article about Aztecs or aztec culture. I understand that "society" could be so broadly defined that it could include almost all expressions of Aztec culture but I think that is not very useful and that it results in large amounts of repetition between this article and articles such as Aztec, Aztec calendar, Aztec history, Aztec cuisine etc. If you want to discuss this approach before I implement it then now is the time. ·Maunus· ·ƛ· 08:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
It seems to me that the word pilli can only be applied to the sons of the tecuhtli (see Google Books). Why this article doesn't mention it and doesn't explain anything about the tecuhtli? You can find the main references about it in the Britannica article and in CAT.INIST. (and probably in JSTOR).
El Comandante ( talk) 10:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
so there are multiple spelling types of the word for the political family groupings in aztec socity
I have reviewed several Nahuatl dictionaries adn found the general consensus to be a 'u' insted of an 'o' in the word 'Calpulli'
However since i am not an expert in the field i do not wish to tamper so if you have a definite knowlege please correct the discrepency
There should be information added on the religion, family dynamics, and the roles that women played within the society. Are there many available sources that cover this material? Kmmy47 ( talk) 17:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I will be reorganizing the article as well as adding a couple of small sections. The original article was unorganized and somewhat hard to follow, so hopefully the new layout works a little better. There have been some changes or additions to existing sections but the majority of the information is staying the same. Tdbdh4 ( talk) 16:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
User Tdbdh4 and MachinaExDeo will be undertaking a significant set of revisions to this article from 16:52 Central time until 20:00 Central Time. In this time, we will be moving content over from both of our sandboxes in small, bite-sized chunks, and we would really appreciate it if any users who are checking over our work would wait until we finish with this series of edits before attempting to revert or offer constructive criticism. Happy editing MachinaExDeo ( talk) 22:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
MachinaExDeo and I have just revised the original article to give it a new structure, new information and section names. We would appreciate it if we could be made aware of missing sources or incorrect information before the article gets reverted to its original state as we have put in a lot of time and effort into improving this article. We will be more than happy to find sources and add them where needed. Tdbdh4 ( talk) 23:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
I will be moving the education section to behind the economics section. I feel this helps the overall organization and flow from most impactful on society to least impactful on society. I will also be reorganizing the economics section and moving the agriculture subsection to the end of that section. Once again, I feel that this helps the overall flow of that section. Tdbdh4 ( talk) 16:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MachinaExDeo. Peer reviewers: Enniks, Smp5gd, Checkerstar.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 15:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
This sentence ("Probably this was one of the first societies that required education for all its members, without regard of gender or social status. ") was removed by User:129.2.183.21 without explanation. If the truth of this sentence is disputed, please state that and explain why.
Thanx.
-- Richard 06:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
OK, but why on Earth is the article tagged??? — Cesar Tort 07:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
I am about to drastically rewrite this article. I think it contains several sections that are of marginal or dubious relevance to the topic. I think the article should focus on the political, social and economical organisation of the aztecs. I think topics such as architecture, art, medicine, calendar, literature and recreation belong somewhere else. For example in the article about Aztecs or aztec culture. I understand that "society" could be so broadly defined that it could include almost all expressions of Aztec culture but I think that is not very useful and that it results in large amounts of repetition between this article and articles such as Aztec, Aztec calendar, Aztec history, Aztec cuisine etc. If you want to discuss this approach before I implement it then now is the time. ·Maunus· ·ƛ· 08:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
It seems to me that the word pilli can only be applied to the sons of the tecuhtli (see Google Books). Why this article doesn't mention it and doesn't explain anything about the tecuhtli? You can find the main references about it in the Britannica article and in CAT.INIST. (and probably in JSTOR).
El Comandante ( talk) 10:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
so there are multiple spelling types of the word for the political family groupings in aztec socity
I have reviewed several Nahuatl dictionaries adn found the general consensus to be a 'u' insted of an 'o' in the word 'Calpulli'
However since i am not an expert in the field i do not wish to tamper so if you have a definite knowlege please correct the discrepency
There should be information added on the religion, family dynamics, and the roles that women played within the society. Are there many available sources that cover this material? Kmmy47 ( talk) 17:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
I will be reorganizing the article as well as adding a couple of small sections. The original article was unorganized and somewhat hard to follow, so hopefully the new layout works a little better. There have been some changes or additions to existing sections but the majority of the information is staying the same. Tdbdh4 ( talk) 16:09, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
User Tdbdh4 and MachinaExDeo will be undertaking a significant set of revisions to this article from 16:52 Central time until 20:00 Central Time. In this time, we will be moving content over from both of our sandboxes in small, bite-sized chunks, and we would really appreciate it if any users who are checking over our work would wait until we finish with this series of edits before attempting to revert or offer constructive criticism. Happy editing MachinaExDeo ( talk) 22:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
MachinaExDeo and I have just revised the original article to give it a new structure, new information and section names. We would appreciate it if we could be made aware of missing sources or incorrect information before the article gets reverted to its original state as we have put in a lot of time and effort into improving this article. We will be more than happy to find sources and add them where needed. Tdbdh4 ( talk) 23:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
I will be moving the education section to behind the economics section. I feel this helps the overall organization and flow from most impactful on society to least impactful on society. I will also be reorganizing the economics section and moving the agriculture subsection to the end of that section. Once again, I feel that this helps the overall flow of that section. Tdbdh4 ( talk) 16:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)