This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
The extent of the muscularisation of the arch is variable... - maybe make it more accessible like, "The proportion of muscle to fibrous tissue in the arch is variable..." or something?
I have put in one citation needed tag. It'd be good if something could be added there as it is otherwise a one-sentence section. Surely there must be some discussion about it...
Some of the references are quite old, though this is not such an issue as with medical articles...
Thanks, these are good points. Small roadblock reached in that I do not have access to the sources, have requested on the resource exchange and hopefully by next weekend will have responded to your remaining concerns. --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
07:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)reply
although one study has reported differences in strength and proprioception between those with and without the arch, differing also between men and women - reporting which group had better strength and proprioception, and exactly how men and women differed is important here.
Done a difficult one, because the sample size is very small and I don't want to give
WP:UNDUE attention, however there aren't any other (that I could find) actual functional studies of the axillary arch, so it is important to include some reference to the study. --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
03:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Not done I have tried what citations I can but I have limited time to devote to this encyclopedia and will spend it editing other articles. Have changed some where I could (ie where doi and PMID exist)
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the
project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
The extent of the muscularisation of the arch is variable... - maybe make it more accessible like, "The proportion of muscle to fibrous tissue in the arch is variable..." or something?
I have put in one citation needed tag. It'd be good if something could be added there as it is otherwise a one-sentence section. Surely there must be some discussion about it...
Some of the references are quite old, though this is not such an issue as with medical articles...
Thanks, these are good points. Small roadblock reached in that I do not have access to the sources, have requested on the resource exchange and hopefully by next weekend will have responded to your remaining concerns. --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
07:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)reply
although one study has reported differences in strength and proprioception between those with and without the arch, differing also between men and women - reporting which group had better strength and proprioception, and exactly how men and women differed is important here.
Done a difficult one, because the sample size is very small and I don't want to give
WP:UNDUE attention, however there aren't any other (that I could find) actual functional studies of the axillary arch, so it is important to include some reference to the study. --
Tom (LT) (
talk)
03:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Not done I have tried what citations I can but I have limited time to devote to this encyclopedia and will spend it editing other articles. Have changed some where I could (ie where doi and PMID exist)