![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi
These are taken from the WikiProject article quality grading scheme:
Stub - The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.
Start - An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.
Ref 1 = proves the pic is 19th century (FAIL)
Ref 2 = A video, with nothing to say what it is, or where exactly the ref details are provided. In the end, the video is simply of a clock ticking and striking and provides no information about what it purports to reference. (FAIL)
Ref 3 = An Elsevier locked link, no way to check the source. (POSS pass)
Ref 4 = A BLOG (FAIL)
Most of those should be easy to replace though.
The other point is that this is such a wide topic, simply saying things such as "like a cuckoo clock" is more a stub than a start.
Then there are:
The article raises many more questions than it gives answers.
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi
These are taken from the WikiProject article quality grading scheme:
Stub - The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; but, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.
Start - An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources.
Ref 1 = proves the pic is 19th century (FAIL)
Ref 2 = A video, with nothing to say what it is, or where exactly the ref details are provided. In the end, the video is simply of a clock ticking and striking and provides no information about what it purports to reference. (FAIL)
Ref 3 = An Elsevier locked link, no way to check the source. (POSS pass)
Ref 4 = A BLOG (FAIL)
Most of those should be easy to replace though.
The other point is that this is such a wide topic, simply saying things such as "like a cuckoo clock" is more a stub than a start.
Then there are:
The article raises many more questions than it gives answers.