This article was nominated for deletion on 6 November 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Climate change Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/12/18/magazine/instead-of-rewarding-pedestrians-and-cyclists-we-treat-them-as-second-class-travelers/ https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/24139147/suvs-trucks-popularity-federal-policy-pollution https://usa.streetsblog.org/2024/06/17/congress-launches-probe-into-why-massive-cars-kill-so-many-pedestrians-and-cyclists https://www.telegraph.co.uk/cars/hybrid-electric-cars/carbesity-microcar-solution-oversized-suvs/

This article says nothing, has very little substance, and seems to be promoting a very specific viewpoint without any contrary evidence. This is not a notable subject, and should probably be deleted. Joseph Zadeh ( talk) 04:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I think it's actually pretty good. From the point of view of everyone except perhaps the people who use the vehicle, there's no upside. Hence the lack of contrary evidence. It relies a lot on news reports so it could use more scholarly referencing. Clayoquot ( talk | contribs) 03:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC) reply