| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 03:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
1. Prose
On hold
2. Verifiability
On hold
3. Depth of Coverage
On hold
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous
On hold
1.
- "and it is possible that though unclear if males" - I think this needs commas to set off the appositive. It just doesn't read well.
- The Owen Lovejoy link is incorrect, you linked to a guy from the 1800s
- A. afarensis is a duplink
- " this is based on only 2 specimens" - MOS:NUMERALS
8 "with 3 successive," - MOS:NUMERALS
2.
- "625–9" - This is a page range, is it standard for the leading digits of the latter number to be lopped off? I don't see that much (I also mostly edit history articles), and it's a touch confusing to look at.
- 629–35." - Ditto as above
- fixed. I see this format a lot but I don't like it so I usually change it User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
3.
- "The remains are dated to about 2.5 million years ago (mya)." - Is it known which method of dating was used?
4.
5.
6.
7.
- The archaeologyInfo EL is dead for me.
- Does the guy who made the Flickr image in the External links have any sort of qualification or subject-matter expertise? If not, I'm not sure if somebody's wild guess should be linked
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 03:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
1. Prose
On hold
2. Verifiability
On hold
3. Depth of Coverage
On hold
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
6. Illustrations ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous
On hold
1.
- "and it is possible that though unclear if males" - I think this needs commas to set off the appositive. It just doesn't read well.
- The Owen Lovejoy link is incorrect, you linked to a guy from the 1800s
- A. afarensis is a duplink
- " this is based on only 2 specimens" - MOS:NUMERALS
8 "with 3 successive," - MOS:NUMERALS
2.
- "625–9" - This is a page range, is it standard for the leading digits of the latter number to be lopped off? I don't see that much (I also mostly edit history articles), and it's a touch confusing to look at.
- 629–35." - Ditto as above
- fixed. I see this format a lot but I don't like it so I usually change it User:Dunkleosteus77 | push to talk 22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
3.
- "The remains are dated to about 2.5 million years ago (mya)." - Is it known which method of dating was used?
4.
5.
6.
7.
- The archaeologyInfo EL is dead for me.
- Does the guy who made the Flickr image in the External links have any sort of qualification or subject-matter expertise? If not, I'm not sure if somebody's wild guess should be linked