This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not sure why it was deleted - using google as a reference is not really that reliable.
The page refers to a number of sources, but does need a tidy up in terms of its referencing.
i will do this over time
Sulzer55 ( talk) 10:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Australian Society of Section Car Operators/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Who is the numbnut who rates but does not give comment? Sulzer55 ( talk) 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
no comment to support the changes made.
the material in the reverted edits is in the public domain and is supported by other appropriate evidence.
it raises two issues - that of the effective management and control of the rail safety management system by those who have a duty under RSNL, and the role of the regulator in ensuring duties are being met.
reverted page to an earlier version to remove what may be vandalism
no justification for the changes made was provided on this page. Sadly there is significant misinformation around about some events associated with the group.
have cleaned up a few things to be more accurate and to reflect what is in the public domain. Edits previously made removed some supporting references.
Happy to discuss
Sulzer55 ( talk) 07:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Unsure why changes were made - references were provided for the information that was originally provided. the Pest from ASSCO1 is back?
material originally referenced is from the ONRSR Website, and ASSCOs own publications Sulzer55 ( talk) 23:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Changes made inline with current factual information. No point reverting back to outdated and irrelevant information and opinion. ChamberlainCase ( talk) 15:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not sure why it was deleted - using google as a reference is not really that reliable.
The page refers to a number of sources, but does need a tidy up in terms of its referencing.
i will do this over time
Sulzer55 ( talk) 10:24, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Australian Society of Section Car Operators/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Who is the numbnut who rates but does not give comment? Sulzer55 ( talk) 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 08:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
no comment to support the changes made.
the material in the reverted edits is in the public domain and is supported by other appropriate evidence.
it raises two issues - that of the effective management and control of the rail safety management system by those who have a duty under RSNL, and the role of the regulator in ensuring duties are being met.
reverted page to an earlier version to remove what may be vandalism
no justification for the changes made was provided on this page. Sadly there is significant misinformation around about some events associated with the group.
have cleaned up a few things to be more accurate and to reflect what is in the public domain. Edits previously made removed some supporting references.
Happy to discuss
Sulzer55 ( talk) 07:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Unsure why changes were made - references were provided for the information that was originally provided. the Pest from ASSCO1 is back?
material originally referenced is from the ONRSR Website, and ASSCOs own publications Sulzer55 ( talk) 23:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Changes made inline with current factual information. No point reverting back to outdated and irrelevant information and opinion. ChamberlainCase ( talk) 15:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)