This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regarding this removal... just because countries other than Australia do not have auto-updating bilateral trade graphs does not mean we should not have them. We are here to write an encyclopedia that is as informative as possible, not to standardize to the lowest common denominator. User:Libstar, please properly explain your repeated removal. -- 99of9 ( talk) 13:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
No, I don't feel the need to explain spikes because I don't support these charts. it is not the bureau of statistics role to expliain trade spikes, they report the data.They add little value and are just a dump of data, and you're avoiding providing valid explanation of what is happening, just dumping it and hoping the reader can draw something out of it. I look at many of the graphs and think they require explanation see Misleading_graphs#Excessive_usage, not to mention the use of the y axis can really exaggerate the spikes. LibStar ( talk) 14:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Serbia split from Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, does the export graph reflect this? LibStar ( talk) 11:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AustraliaâSerbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.afp.gov.au/media-centre/news/afp/2012/february/AFP-and-serbian-police-sign-new-agreement{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ms.gov.rs/aktuelnosti/sporazum-o-direktnim-letovima-izmedu-srbije-i-australije/?lang=enWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regarding this removal... just because countries other than Australia do not have auto-updating bilateral trade graphs does not mean we should not have them. We are here to write an encyclopedia that is as informative as possible, not to standardize to the lowest common denominator. User:Libstar, please properly explain your repeated removal. -- 99of9 ( talk) 13:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
No, I don't feel the need to explain spikes because I don't support these charts. it is not the bureau of statistics role to expliain trade spikes, they report the data.They add little value and are just a dump of data, and you're avoiding providing valid explanation of what is happening, just dumping it and hoping the reader can draw something out of it. I look at many of the graphs and think they require explanation see Misleading_graphs#Excessive_usage, not to mention the use of the y axis can really exaggerate the spikes. LibStar ( talk) 14:14, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Serbia split from Serbia and Montenegro in 2006, does the export graph reflect this? LibStar ( talk) 11:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AustraliaâSerbia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.afp.gov.au/media-centre/news/afp/2012/february/AFP-and-serbian-police-sign-new-agreement{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ms.gov.rs/aktuelnosti/sporazum-o-direktnim-letovima-izmedu-srbije-i-australije/?lang=enWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)