![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
By 1980, the legendary Mini was 21 years ago. Although it was destined to continue another 20 years, British Leyland needed to launch a more modern alternative in order to stay afloat.
The solution to BL's problems was the launch of its three-door Austin Metro hatchback. It used much of the Mini's drivetrain and suspension but a far more modern bodyshell. The 1.0 and 1.3 A-plus engines were upgraded versions of the A-series units used in the Mini, the 1.3 was also used in the larger Allegro.
The Metro soon became the best selling car in Britain and in 1983 a five-door variant was launched. In the same year, an MG-badged Metro with a more powerful 1.3 engine and a top speed of 100mph was launched.
But the ultimate Metro was the MG Metro 6R4 which was launched in 1985 as a rally car although it did find a few homes as a roadgoing car.
The Metro had a good amount of interior space despite its compact bodyshell, and the hydragras suspension gave class-leading ride and handling. The asking price was also reasonable.
After 10 years of production, the Austin marque was shelved and the Metro was rebadged as a Rover. It also received a major facelift which brought it nearer to the top of the supermini class. The 1.0 and 1.3 A-plus engines were scrapped in place of the impressive 1.1 and 1.4 K-series units. The MG variants were discontinued.
The original Austin Metro had suffered from rust, corrosion and unreliable mechanicals. The 1990 Rover version was an all-round improvement which had a quality feel.
1994 saw the Metro nameplate discontinued but the car lived on as the Rover 100 - little more than a facelifted version of the Metro.
In 1997, the Rover 100 was slated in the motoring press after a poor showing in crash safety tests. It was hardly a surprise the following year when Rover announced the end of 100 production - and the end of an important chapter in British motoring history which had lasted 18 years.
There was no direct replacement for the Rover 100 (Metro), but in 1999 the Rover 25 was re-positioned as a supermini - it had been facelifted from the larger 200.
The above text appears to have been mistakenly added to the talk space by user:213.122.37.28. This is the case for a number of pages possibly including:
Since these appear to be good quality edits, please merge the new text and delete both it and this notice when done. I shall try and do some too but don't have much time. Thanks. akaDruid 13:54, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I guess we all know there was a "factory" open-top version of the Metro/100, but unless I missed something (which is very probable), the article does not mention it at all. It would be very interesting to find out when it was launched, how it was developed and who actually built it - BL/Rover or some coachbuilder? BTW, where was the Metro actually built - Longbridge or elsewhere? Bravada, talk - 13:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
FYI: - Leonard G. 22:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I am, frankly, stunned that even an item of such significance as the MG Metro 6R4 Group B rally car does not appear to carry sufficient clout in order to warrant its own, separate article from the 'mere' Rover Metro 'shopping car'. I suppose I'll have to 'be bold' and tend to that. MRacer 22:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
"The engine was mounted back to front in the car, with the forward end of the engine facing the hatchback and the gearbox attached conventionally behind it and, therefore, in the middle of the vehicle."
- The engine is mid-mounted with the transmission behind it, so the front of the engine would face towards the windshield.
- The flywheel end would face the hatchback (and transmission). (666)
Took out this bit "or more specifically Austin Rover" referring to the launch of the Mini Metro. Austin Rover did not come about till 1982. I think it was still Austin Morris that launched the Mini Metro in 1980. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.231.233 ( talk) 20:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
I've just changed the main infobox from "Austin Metro" to "Rover Metro" since it's not (apparently) a generation infobox but a master one. It seems wrong though to then have no Austin Metro generation box. But the bigger question is, why is this article not in fact titled "Austin Metro", since that was the model's first name, at launch. Thoughts? – Kieran T ( talk) 17:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was moved. -- RegentsPark ( talk) 01:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Rover Metro → Austin Metro — Relisted. Vegaswikian ( talk) 06:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
"The Rover 100 finally ceased production in 1997, ironically being out-lived (by two years) by the original Mini it was meant to replace." contradicts: "On 8 October 1980, BL introduced the Austin mini Metro. It was intended as a big brother, rather than as a replacement, for the Mini," and "It was intended to complement the Mini" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.64.150 ( talk) 11:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Do any TV documentaries or DVD's exist for the mini-METRO ? (not the 6R4 which has it's own DVD available from Duke video). Odd how a documentary or other TV programme exists for just about every other popular car but not the Metro as yet it seems. -- Live Steam Mad ( talk) 16:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Austin Metro. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Austin Metro. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
By 1980, the legendary Mini was 21 years ago. Although it was destined to continue another 20 years, British Leyland needed to launch a more modern alternative in order to stay afloat.
The solution to BL's problems was the launch of its three-door Austin Metro hatchback. It used much of the Mini's drivetrain and suspension but a far more modern bodyshell. The 1.0 and 1.3 A-plus engines were upgraded versions of the A-series units used in the Mini, the 1.3 was also used in the larger Allegro.
The Metro soon became the best selling car in Britain and in 1983 a five-door variant was launched. In the same year, an MG-badged Metro with a more powerful 1.3 engine and a top speed of 100mph was launched.
But the ultimate Metro was the MG Metro 6R4 which was launched in 1985 as a rally car although it did find a few homes as a roadgoing car.
The Metro had a good amount of interior space despite its compact bodyshell, and the hydragras suspension gave class-leading ride and handling. The asking price was also reasonable.
After 10 years of production, the Austin marque was shelved and the Metro was rebadged as a Rover. It also received a major facelift which brought it nearer to the top of the supermini class. The 1.0 and 1.3 A-plus engines were scrapped in place of the impressive 1.1 and 1.4 K-series units. The MG variants were discontinued.
The original Austin Metro had suffered from rust, corrosion and unreliable mechanicals. The 1990 Rover version was an all-round improvement which had a quality feel.
1994 saw the Metro nameplate discontinued but the car lived on as the Rover 100 - little more than a facelifted version of the Metro.
In 1997, the Rover 100 was slated in the motoring press after a poor showing in crash safety tests. It was hardly a surprise the following year when Rover announced the end of 100 production - and the end of an important chapter in British motoring history which had lasted 18 years.
There was no direct replacement for the Rover 100 (Metro), but in 1999 the Rover 25 was re-positioned as a supermini - it had been facelifted from the larger 200.
The above text appears to have been mistakenly added to the talk space by user:213.122.37.28. This is the case for a number of pages possibly including:
Since these appear to be good quality edits, please merge the new text and delete both it and this notice when done. I shall try and do some too but don't have much time. Thanks. akaDruid 13:54, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I guess we all know there was a "factory" open-top version of the Metro/100, but unless I missed something (which is very probable), the article does not mention it at all. It would be very interesting to find out when it was launched, how it was developed and who actually built it - BL/Rover or some coachbuilder? BTW, where was the Metro actually built - Longbridge or elsewhere? Bravada, talk - 13:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
FYI: - Leonard G. 22:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I am, frankly, stunned that even an item of such significance as the MG Metro 6R4 Group B rally car does not appear to carry sufficient clout in order to warrant its own, separate article from the 'mere' Rover Metro 'shopping car'. I suppose I'll have to 'be bold' and tend to that. MRacer 22:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
"The engine was mounted back to front in the car, with the forward end of the engine facing the hatchback and the gearbox attached conventionally behind it and, therefore, in the middle of the vehicle."
- The engine is mid-mounted with the transmission behind it, so the front of the engine would face towards the windshield.
- The flywheel end would face the hatchback (and transmission). (666)
Took out this bit "or more specifically Austin Rover" referring to the launch of the Mini Metro. Austin Rover did not come about till 1982. I think it was still Austin Morris that launched the Mini Metro in 1980. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.231.233 ( talk) 20:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
I've just changed the main infobox from "Austin Metro" to "Rover Metro" since it's not (apparently) a generation infobox but a master one. It seems wrong though to then have no Austin Metro generation box. But the bigger question is, why is this article not in fact titled "Austin Metro", since that was the model's first name, at launch. Thoughts? – Kieran T ( talk) 17:06, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was moved. -- RegentsPark ( talk) 01:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Rover Metro → Austin Metro — Relisted. Vegaswikian ( talk) 06:12, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
"The Rover 100 finally ceased production in 1997, ironically being out-lived (by two years) by the original Mini it was meant to replace." contradicts: "On 8 October 1980, BL introduced the Austin mini Metro. It was intended as a big brother, rather than as a replacement, for the Mini," and "It was intended to complement the Mini" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.237.64.150 ( talk) 11:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Do any TV documentaries or DVD's exist for the mini-METRO ? (not the 6R4 which has it's own DVD available from Duke video). Odd how a documentary or other TV programme exists for just about every other popular car but not the Metro as yet it seems. -- Live Steam Mad ( talk) 16:11, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Austin Metro. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Austin Metro. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 11:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)