This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article present title (Abruttus) contradicts to WP:Title, because the most relevant modern sources (RAN: [1], and LIM: Culturii şi Patrimoniului Naţional, page 3) do not use the Abruttus denomination for the site. Furthermore, this medieval Latin name of the town is anachronistic in the context of the article ( Roman Dacia). The name of the town was first attested in 1271 in the form Obruth which later developed into the form containing the vowel "a" [2]. Pascu's POV from the early 1980s could, of course, be mentioned, but his passing reference to Abruttus in the context of the article is not enough. Borsoka ( talk) 06:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Auraria Daciae (castellum). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article present title (Abruttus) contradicts to WP:Title, because the most relevant modern sources (RAN: [1], and LIM: Culturii şi Patrimoniului Naţional, page 3) do not use the Abruttus denomination for the site. Furthermore, this medieval Latin name of the town is anachronistic in the context of the article ( Roman Dacia). The name of the town was first attested in 1271 in the form Obruth which later developed into the form containing the vowel "a" [2]. Pascu's POV from the early 1980s could, of course, be mentioned, but his passing reference to Abruttus in the context of the article is not enough. Borsoka ( talk) 06:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Auraria Daciae (castellum). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)