This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Aura (paranormal) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 29 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Aura. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
A full rewrite was suggested, I cleaned up the article a bit but more work is definitely needed. — Paleo Neonate — 01:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Opening this discussion. Comments welcome, thanks — Paleo Neonate — 16:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
If I understand, sfn is a more common way to do this, keeping the notes outside of the text while allowing to refer to pages (and automatically combining duplicates). Rp is an alternative way that may be used when sfn would cause an abnormally high number of footnotes despite automatic combining. While rp permits to refer to pages, when used with blue links, part of the reference appears in the text (page numbers) while the source link is required to know which source they point to. Sfn allows to keep it all outside of the main text without loss of information. — Paleo Neonate — 16:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Either method is acceptable per the MOS. In this case I think the sfn presents a cleaner References section for the reader. – S. Rich ( talk) 13:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
It has recently come to my attention that 2 aura readers will see the same colors in a persons aura. So to prove the existence of aura you just have to get 2 aura readers in separate rooms where they cant hear each other and ask them to read their own auras in front of a scientist. then they have to go to the same room without telling each other what they saw and read each others auras. if both instances of each persons auras being read line up, then aura is real, if they don't then it means aura isn't real, of course it wont disprove my method of reading aura as I use a completely different technique. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.49.192.157 ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) NW1223 <Howl at me• My hunts> 20:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
– Primary topic by both pageviews and longterm significance. According to views, the symptom is the only thing that even gets close to the views of the paranormal/spiritual topic, and the name of the symptom is clearly based on the paranormal occurrence/fictional concept (it is about seeing "auras" in front of things like the supposed energy field). The mythological goddess might be able to compete for longterm significance, but is only a minor goddess. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 19:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Human energy field and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 16#Human energy field until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Aura (paranormal) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 730 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 29 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Aura. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
A full rewrite was suggested, I cleaned up the article a bit but more work is definitely needed. — Paleo Neonate — 01:39, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Opening this discussion. Comments welcome, thanks — Paleo Neonate — 16:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
If I understand, sfn is a more common way to do this, keeping the notes outside of the text while allowing to refer to pages (and automatically combining duplicates). Rp is an alternative way that may be used when sfn would cause an abnormally high number of footnotes despite automatic combining. While rp permits to refer to pages, when used with blue links, part of the reference appears in the text (page numbers) while the source link is required to know which source they point to. Sfn allows to keep it all outside of the main text without loss of information. — Paleo Neonate — 16:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Either method is acceptable per the MOS. In this case I think the sfn presents a cleaner References section for the reader. – S. Rich ( talk) 13:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
It has recently come to my attention that 2 aura readers will see the same colors in a persons aura. So to prove the existence of aura you just have to get 2 aura readers in separate rooms where they cant hear each other and ask them to read their own auras in front of a scientist. then they have to go to the same room without telling each other what they saw and read each others auras. if both instances of each persons auras being read line up, then aura is real, if they don't then it means aura isn't real, of course it wont disprove my method of reading aura as I use a completely different technique. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.49.192.157 ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 02:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( non-admin closure) NW1223 <Howl at me• My hunts> 20:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
– Primary topic by both pageviews and longterm significance. According to views, the symptom is the only thing that even gets close to the views of the paranormal/spiritual topic, and the name of the symptom is clearly based on the paranormal occurrence/fictional concept (it is about seeing "auras" in front of things like the supposed energy field). The mythological goddess might be able to compete for longterm significance, but is only a minor goddess. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 19:54, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Human energy field and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 16#Human energy field until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 15:30, 16 November 2022 (UTC)