From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Harrison49 (
talk)
14:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
reply
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B.
MoS compliance for
lead,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
lists:
- The article follows a good style and layout throughout.
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A.
References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C.
No original research:
- References are well used.
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- The articles follows the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article maintains a neutral point of view.
- Is it stable?
- No
edit wars, etc:
- The article does not appear to be subject to any edit wars.
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have
fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with
suitable captions:
- Images not in the public domain have full fair use rationales.
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- A very interesting read.
Harrison49 (
talk)
16:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you for reviewing my work.
Canpark (
talk)
09:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
reply