This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since this is bound to spark a series of edits and at least one editor of a behind the scenes magazine once expressed his joy at ensuring that the relevant issue would be accurate and libel free, here's a quick rundown on the state of play as far as I am aware:
Feel free to chip in with what else is in circulation. Timrollpickering 00:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
the Sixth doctor guide also adds that Paula was a friend of Saward. GraemeLeggett 12:34, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Bit late to the party, think the section in the article reads OK, but are there any citations to back it up? Biscit ( talk) 08:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm slightly confused about the supposed "Script editors can't commission themselves" problem. I assume The Visitation and perhaps Earthshock were commissioned by Root, but who besides Saward would have commissioned Resurrection of the Daleks and Revelation of the Daleks, both of which Saward was credited with? In terms of earlier script editors writing stories, Bidmead got credit for Logopolis and Holmes for The Ark in Space (which perhaps he didn't commission), The Deadly Assassin, and The Talons of Weng-Chiang. What exactly is the actual rule here? Why could Saward be credited for Revelation of the Daleks only a few months after he was supposedly not allowed to credit himself for Attack of the Cybermen? john k ( talk) 21:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Attack of the Cybermen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1989/attack/89attack.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since this is bound to spark a series of edits and at least one editor of a behind the scenes magazine once expressed his joy at ensuring that the relevant issue would be accurate and libel free, here's a quick rundown on the state of play as far as I am aware:
Feel free to chip in with what else is in circulation. Timrollpickering 00:24, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
the Sixth doctor guide also adds that Paula was a friend of Saward. GraemeLeggett 12:34, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Bit late to the party, think the section in the article reads OK, but are there any citations to back it up? Biscit ( talk) 08:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm slightly confused about the supposed "Script editors can't commission themselves" problem. I assume The Visitation and perhaps Earthshock were commissioned by Root, but who besides Saward would have commissioned Resurrection of the Daleks and Revelation of the Daleks, both of which Saward was credited with? In terms of earlier script editors writing stories, Bidmead got credit for Logopolis and Holmes for The Ark in Space (which perhaps he didn't commission), The Deadly Assassin, and The Talons of Weng-Chiang. What exactly is the actual rule here? Why could Saward be credited for Revelation of the Daleks only a few months after he was supposedly not allowed to credit himself for Attack of the Cybermen? john k ( talk) 21:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Attack of the Cybermen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1989/attack/89attack.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)